Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: crazyhorse691

I don't know if Wyden is telling the truth; Rush seemd certain he isn't.

But if it is true, it's one more thing to be concerned about.


3 posted on 08/10/2005 1:36:51 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TBP

Why would that be a concern?

It is NOT the Judiciaries place to determine if the act is moral or not.

They are there to decide if the law is being followed.

You are advocating judicial activism if this causes you "concern".


5 posted on 08/10/2005 1:41:15 PM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

"But if it is true, it's one more thing to be concerned about."

I think the SCOTUS striking the Oregon law would be similar to it's ruling in Roe v Wade - ie an intrusion on the States Rignts to govern themselves. So what is it your concerned about?


6 posted on 08/10/2005 1:41:56 PM PDT by Ignatius J Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

Roberts is looking like another Souter. It's disturbing and will be one more notch of infamy for the Bush family of Presidents.


16 posted on 08/10/2005 4:00:24 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Choose LIFE. Circumcision = Barbarism. It's HIS body; what about HIS right to choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson