Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bagram Runway Reopens After C-17 Incident
Defend America News ^ | Aug 9, 2005 | Air Force Capt. Mark D. Gibson

Posted on 08/09/2005 4:56:19 PM PDT by SandRat

Quick action and creative thinking by Air Force and Army engineers had the runway fully active again in less than 30 hours.

BAGRAM AIRFIELD, Afghanistan, Aug. 9, 2005 — A U.S. Air Force C-17 Globemaster III aircraft rolled off the runway while landing at Bagram Airfield Aug. 6, damaging its nose and right main landing gears. As a result, the runway was closed, but quick action and creative thinking by Air Force and Army engineers had the runway fully active again in less than 30 hours.

There were no injuries in the incident.

"This is the best cooperative effort between the Air Force and Army that I have seen in my 26-year career." U.S. Army Col. Michael Flanagan attribution

When it came to rest, one of the C-17's wings extended over the active runway, so the aircraft had to be moved to allow the full range of aviation operations at Bagram. Air operations continued while the C-17 was moved off the active runway, and other airfields continued providing air support for Operation Enduring Freedom.

Aircraft from Bagram diverted to other airfields and were able to re-launch and conduct combat missions in support of ground forces.

Other coalition air forces also assisted in ensuring a constant airpower presence was maintained over the battlefield during the aircraft recovery operations at Bagram.

Moving the aircraft proved to be a complicated process, said U.S. Air Force Col. Donald Jones, 455th Expeditionary Mission Support Group commander, who directed the effort. "It took one big team to brainstorm and come up with the tools and methods we needed."

The hardest part of this process was determining a way to lift the nose of the aircraft without damaging the aircraft any further.

First the fuel and cargo needed to be removed. The team removed 105,000 pounds of fuel and unloaded 55,000 pounds of cargo, with the remaining gross weight of the aircraft estimated at 300,000 pounds. Because of the tilt of the aircraft, the cargo could not be removed by forklift through the cargo door. The cargo pallets had to be broken down into individual boxes, pieces and parts that were carried out through the crew door.

Next the team had to replace the C-17's unusable landing gear. Their solution was a flatbed trailer, crane, and railroad ties.

The aircraft was lifted with the crane, inches at a time, and wood was placed under the nose to support it. The team backed the flatbed tractor trailer under the nose and removed the wood. Straps were tied to the trailer and passed through the pilot's windows and open doors to secure the aircraft onto the truck.

The team assembled metal airfield matting, provided by U.S. Army engineers assigned to Charlie Company, 391st Engineer Battalion, to roll the aircraft onto the runway. The Army engineers also provided two bulldozers and the flatbed to drag the aircraft back onto the runway to a parking ramp.

"Once again, we had great cooperation between the Air Force and Army here. We worked together as a team to get a job done in one night that many people thought would take four days. This is the best cooperative effort between the Air Force and Army that I have seen in my 26-year career," said U.S. Army Col. Michael Flanagan, 18th Engineer Brigade and Task Force Sword commander.

Jones, knowing the priority was getting the runway open, orchestrated the two bulldozers, the flatbed, and a ring of people around the aircraft. They used hand signals and walkie-talkies as they inched the aircraft down the runway through three 90-degree turns to its parking spot.

"We had to get this runway open and get A-10s in the air to provide close air support for soldiers on the ground," said Jones.

"Everyone came together to make suggestions and form a workable plan to help get the C-17 off the active runway and resume normal flying operations in minimal time," said U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. Bruce E. Burda, 455th Air Expeditionary Wing commander.

"I am extremely proud of the way our airmen, soldiers and civilians came together, devised a solution to this unique challenge, and safely made it happen to quickly restore airfield operations."

The aircraft is assigned to Charleston Air Force Base, S.C.

The C-17 measures 174 feet long with a wingspan of 169 feet. It is operated by a crew of three and can carry up to 170,000 lbs of cargo.

The cause of the incident is under investigation.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; bagram; c17; incident; oef; reopens; runway; usaf

1 posted on 08/09/2005 4:56:27 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; Kathy in Alaska; Fawnn; HiJinx; Radix; Spotsy; Diva Betsy Ross; ...

OUCH! That's going to be one big parking ticket fine to pay!


2 posted on 08/09/2005 4:57:11 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Straps were tied to the trailer and passed through the pilot's windows and open doors to secure the aircraft onto the truck.

Sounds like moving day.
3 posted on 08/09/2005 5:03:38 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Here's a photo of the incident.

4 posted on 08/09/2005 5:07:24 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Here's super large view (2400 x 1594) of the same picture.

It's pretty big at 500kb but you can see a lot of detail.

5 posted on 08/09/2005 5:09:56 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Somebody's flying career may have just poofed, eh?


6 posted on 08/09/2005 5:10:35 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

Yep, what we used to call a "career ender".


7 posted on 08/09/2005 5:12:00 PM PDT by alarm rider (Irritating leftists as often as is humanly possible....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
God bless our military for the jobs they do, both separately, and in this case, together.
8 posted on 08/09/2005 5:28:53 PM PDT by Kathy in Alaska (~ www.ProudPatriots.org ~ coming soon ~Operation Semper Fi ~a field hospital~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Ouch!


9 posted on 08/09/2005 5:36:27 PM PDT by Lady Jag (Honor - Dignity - Courage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
The cause of the incident is under investigation.

My guess is that the pilot will end up with most of the credit.

10 posted on 08/09/2005 5:36:55 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
My guess is that the pilot will end up with most of the credit.

Surely there's an enlisted man; an air traffic controller, a flight engineer, a loadmaster, or other enlisted somewhere to blame it all on.

11 posted on 08/09/2005 5:51:24 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Time for an FEB (Flying Evaluation Board).

Poor bastards.

12 posted on 08/09/2005 6:35:54 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Sort of get the feeling that the aircraft commander is about to get rated for something new to fly; the mighty D30X60 Desk.


13 posted on 08/09/2005 6:41:22 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Looks like a long landing. If you can't get it down in the first 3,000' of the touchdown zone, go around--right? He had a bunch of cargo, so he was definitely carrying power over the numbers, but too many pilots think an airline type soft landing where you can't feel the transition from flare to main wheel contact is nirvana.

Not in a heavy strategic cargo aircraft it isn't.

Expect lots of FCIFs, safety meetings, and altered instructor techniques after the safety board releases its findings.

14 posted on 08/09/2005 6:47:26 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

BTTT!!!!!


15 posted on 08/10/2005 3:07:38 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson