Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sex Offenders Banned From Storm Shelters
AP Via WTOP Radio ^ | 8/7/2005

Posted on 08/07/2005 6:33:28 PM PDT by markomalley

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. (AP) - Sex offenders tracked by the state are banned from public hurricane shelters in Florida under a new policy that allows them to weather the storms in prison instead.

The policy was created to keep sex offenders and predators away from children, said Robby Cunningham, spokesman for the Department of Corrections. Offenders who go to a prison will stay in areas such as visitor or meeting rooms, he said.

"They are not incarcerated," Cunningham said Saturday. "We don't want them on the streets. We don't want them violating their probation either."

The policy only affects sex offenders under state supervision who are not allowed near children. They can go to a prison if their evacuation address given to authorities can't be used or is deemed unacceptable, Cunningham said. He did not know how many sex offenders could be affected.

The policy took effect at the beginning of hurricane season, June 1. Six offenders stayed in prisons during Hurricane Dennis in July.

Sex offenders have to sign a form that outlines instructions, wear an ID badge, and they can be searched by authorities at any time.

Randall Marshall, legal director of the Florida ACLU, said the policy could push sex offenders out of the supervision of authorities.

"If you take people who have served their sentence and are released from prison and try to (reinstate) themselves in society, the more steps you take to isolate and ostracize them ... there are very few options for them to live their lives and not reoffend," he said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: abusers; aclu; hurricane; perverts; predators; shelter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
You know, I hate to admit it, but I actually find myself agreeing with the ACLU's diagnosis of the situation. If somebody's done their time, they've done their time.

Of course the ACLU would likely not agree with what I'd recommend as a solution: lock them up permanently, put them in mental institutions with no possible release, or dump them on an isolated island in the middle of the Pacific ocean.

I don't say that out of a desire for vengence for them, but rather because my understanding is that pedophilia, etc., is a sexual preference (according to my understanding of current psychobabble)...and since (according to the gay activist crowd), sexual preference is something inherent that can't be altered, the only solution for people with a pedophile sexual preference is to isolate them permanently.

So I believe that Fla is wrong in their actions here...but I don't think that the PC crowd (esp. the ACLU) would approve of the necessary fix to protect society...so, they should either approve eliminating the problem...or they should deal with the compromise.

In the words of my daughter...as if!

1 posted on 08/07/2005 6:33:33 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Sorry - no, you can't come in the shelter. But here's a really big rock to hang on to...


2 posted on 08/07/2005 6:34:28 PM PDT by Tennessee_Bob ("Nac Mac Feegle! The Wee Free Men! Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! We willna be fooled again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

IMHO, sex offenders have never done enough time.


3 posted on 08/07/2005 6:36:06 PM PDT by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I dare you to tell Mark Lunsford that.


4 posted on 08/07/2005 6:37:06 PM PDT by CajunConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Of course the ACLU would likely not agree with what I'd recommend as a solution: lock them up permanently, put them in mental institutions with no possible release, or dump them on an isolated island in the middle of the Pacific ocean.

I wonder if they would argue much if your solution were applied to convictions obtained after such became law.

5 posted on 08/07/2005 6:40:00 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Trad-Ang Ping: I read the dreck so you don't have to || Iran Azadi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

As sex offenders are highly likely to strike again, it's wise not to let them in storm shelters.


6 posted on 08/07/2005 6:40:52 PM PDT by Firefigher NC (Volunteer firefighters- standing tall, serving proud in the tradition of Ben Franklin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CajunConservative
I dare you to tell Mark Lunsford that.

Did you read my entire post?

If not, please do so. If so, please do so again.

If you had, I believe the only argument Mark Lunsford would have with me is that I favor permanent isolation from society, while he prefers a death sentence.

7 posted on 08/07/2005 6:43:07 PM PDT by markomalley (Vivat Iesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Firefigher NC

Actually, the recidivism rates are, according the the following reports:

# NCJ-163392 (February 7, 1997), Sex Offenses and Offenders: An Analysis of Data on Rape and Sexual Assault, finds the recidivism rate of 2,214 convicted rapists released from prison was 7.7% after three years. The only category of crimes with a lower recidivism rate are those persons convicted of murder (6.8%).

http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2005/03/the_intersectio.html


8 posted on 08/07/2005 6:44:45 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Firefigher NC

I almost agree with you.

I would modify your statement as follows:

As sex offenders ware highly likely to strike again, it's wise not to ever let them out in public again.


9 posted on 08/07/2005 6:47:15 PM PDT by markomalley (Vivat Iesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Mark Klaas made a point the other night, " no sex offender in the history of the world has ever been 'rehabilitated'"

this is something I hadn't considered, though.


10 posted on 08/07/2005 6:47:25 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I did go back and see where I jumped the gun when you said you agreed with the ACLU. I apologize. However, if they are undeniably guilty, I think they should be sentenced to death. They don't change. It's more like a compulsion than just a sexual preference. These are people who are master manipulators at stalking their prey.


11 posted on 08/07/2005 6:50:13 PM PDT by CajunConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
I have to say this is probably illegal. They're being denied access to public shelters during emergency after they've served their sentences. If you want to keep them out of public shelters then keep them in prison for life. Otherwise, suck it up, and play by the rules. Making separate accomidation *via PRISON* is simply unethical on the part of the state.

Nice try Jeb, but it won't and shouldn't pass Constitutional muster.

12 posted on 08/07/2005 6:50:25 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Choose LIFE. Circumcision = Barbarism. It's HIS body; what about HIS right to choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

You'll have to prove that one. I can buy an extremely high rate of recidivism, but I can't buy that the rate is a perfect 100%. Sounds like bad science to me.


13 posted on 08/07/2005 6:50:33 PM PDT by Melas (The dumber the troll, the longer the thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

I'm certain they would argue that law no matter how it was applied.

But consider this: a person can be committed to a mental institution without being subjected to double jeopardy for a single crime. I'd like to see a law like the one I proposed passed for future offenders and would also like to see pedophile prisoners completing their terms in prison being met by a straitjacket and a commitment order the second they walk out of prison.

That practice would preserve their civil rights (medical procedures can't violate civil rights...just ask Michael Schiavo) while protecting the rest of society from the scum.


14 posted on 08/07/2005 6:51:26 PM PDT by markomalley (Vivat Iesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CajunConservative

No argument with you there...I'm just against the death penalty...life in a hole (housed with bubba) seems like it would be more appropriate imho...


15 posted on 08/07/2005 6:52:45 PM PDT by markomalley (Vivat Iesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

You know, I hate to admit it, but I actually find myself agreeing with the ACLU's diagnosis of the situation. If somebody's done their time, they've done their time.

Me too.... but I think every card carrying ACLU memeber should be required to take one into their home for rehabilitation and to reintegrate sex offenders into society using their kids and their neighborhoods as the test area.


16 posted on 08/07/2005 6:53:15 PM PDT by commonasdirt (Reading DU so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Then how do you explain the perps with multiple offenses continually reoffending? I worked as a case manager with several pedophiles and they are all back in jail for reoffending.


17 posted on 08/07/2005 6:53:56 PM PDT by CajunConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

I have to say this is probably illegal. They're being denied access to public shelters during emergency after they've served their sentences.

The problem is, many, perhaps most, of these offenders are required not to be in the presence of children. Storm shelters shelter children as well, so the sex offenders cannot be legally there.


18 posted on 08/07/2005 6:57:15 PM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

It's basically still a death sentence and then we are delegating justice out to a prisoner instead of the state. That really isn't right. It should not be up to prisoners to administer appropriate justice.


19 posted on 08/07/2005 6:59:05 PM PDT by CajunConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Just what the man said, I make no personal claim to it.

He's just a lot more familiar with the subject than anyone here, I would wager. And I'm sure his remarks are not grounded in fact.

But I think you probably already knew that.


20 posted on 08/07/2005 7:02:03 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson