[sayfer bullets]

Funny how the science worship[p]ers alway tout "the scientific method" and refer to "scientific truth". Then they tell us we must change our morals.

I've never seen that, especially since science has nothing to say about morals.

The writer clearly stated that "science worshippers" do. It's merely basic sentence structure. Persons leaning on "science" as some type of omnipresent theocracy-prevention guard DO overstate "its" reach.

[balrog666]

The writer clearly stated that "science worshippers" do.

Bullsh!t! The story says nothing about morals.

It's merely basic sentence structure. Persons leaning on "science" as some type of omnipresent theocracy-prevention guard DO overstate "its" reach.

Such an interpretation is just another idiotic non-sequitur.