Note that he was divorced in 1986 from his wife of 13 years. I wonder if his first wife has any insight on his character. Or do Republicans not play that way?
Posted on 08/05/2005 12:46:33 PM PDT by rmgatto
In a column that ran in the Sun-Times on Monday, Novak suggested he learned Plame's identity partly from reading Who's Who in America. A CNN source said a producer had placed a copy of Who's Who on the set Thursday prior to the taping, apparently so it could be consulted while Novak was asked about the issue...What's inside that book?
(Excerpt) Read more at wizbangblog.com ...
What's the story line here?
Some liberal was pretending to be more important than they really were and when somebody took them at their word, they were totally embarrassed, humiliated and outed?
That happens daily in our local newspapers. That's what liberals "do."
"A CNN source said a producer had placed a copy of Who's Who on the set Thursday prior to the taping, apparently so it could be consulted while Novak was asked about the issue"
Novak looked up a name in Who's Who. To CNN, that seems like some extraordinary and ominous effort.
Note that he was divorced in 1986 from his wife of 13 years. I wonder if his first wife has any insight on his character. Or do Republicans not play that way?
Is it normal to list your former wife? If it is, he was married three times, so why only the names of 2 wifes listed?
Because his 2nd wife Jacqueline is a french national who works in the french diplomatic circles( or as some have said spook). Ain't that something!
It would. The average broadcast journalist can neither read nor write.
Her maiden name was listed in the 2000 Washington D.C. telephone book according to this:
http://tinyurl.com/d22hg
Miss Marple, do you know of any Freeper doing family research that might have a subscription to Ancestry that can get this record.
I do know that the plural of wife is wives (DUH).
Just to clarify, I mean just to see if she lists her home address. I certainly don't mean to see what the phone number is, and I am sure they have changed it by now anyway. Just seems funny that 2000 is the only year listed.
To those I pinged, please read #10 and #11. Any help or advice you have would be greatly appreciated.
You have freepmail.
I think it was the words "CIA Operative" that nice Mr. Wilson interpreted as "Jane Bond"...rather than a CIA Dem Operative....which (IMHO) was what Mr. Novak was implying. (Her contribution to the Dems was evidence). Joe bit.....Big dummy. Getting Rove and Libby involved was the coverup.
Who's Who sends nominees a biographical sketch. They also allow nominees to change info. So that may explain it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.