Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYP: ROBERTS CRITICS' AGENDA OF HATE -- JFK won despite anti-Catholic bias.
New York Post ^ | August 2, 2005 | GEORGE J. MARLIN

Posted on 08/02/2005 5:33:44 AM PDT by OESY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: defconw

Kennedy is nominally Catholic. I doubt that his kids retain even a vestiage of the old Irish-Catholicism.


61 posted on 08/02/2005 9:48:50 AM PDT by RobbyS (chirho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

I am sure you are right, but I look not to Kennedy but rather to Santorum! Kennedy is a very sad joke and waste of human potential! I think his brothers, at least Robert would be ashamed of him.


62 posted on 08/02/2005 9:53:28 AM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: defconw
I think his brothers, at least Robert would be ashamed of him

I agree with you, especially Robert! My mom has always hated the Kennedys - not just conversational "I hate them" but a real deep visceral hatred. I didn't even hear a good word after JFK was assassinated (she only registered to vote just so she could vote for Nixon in 1960). However when they were bringing Bobby Kennedy's body to DC for part of his funeral, when some news commentator mentioned Ethel Kennedy, my mom said "that poor woman has no say in her own husband's funeral." To this day it was the only nice thing she's had to say about any Kennedy, and I will always remember that!

63 posted on 08/02/2005 10:00:42 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (fiat voluntas Tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan
Thanks for sharing, I grew up, I hate to admit, idolizing RFK, but his speeches were then were mostly Zell Miller like, except for his anti-Vietnam thing, and who knows had he not been killed. He was a good Catholic at the time, but I was also 4, so take my thoughts with grain of salt. I think or at least like to think he would have been like Zell not Teddy! I was just a child though and don't actually remember him.
64 posted on 08/02/2005 10:06:38 AM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: defconw
Benedict may put in end to this soon, from what I have heard!

I too have heard this.

It will be interesting to watch the indignation come out then.

Funny... in the course of leaders of the church trying to save lives for eternity, they will be condemned by the very people they seek to save.

Amazing to watch. It already took plave here with Arch-bishop Raymond Burke.

65 posted on 08/02/2005 10:07:14 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee
I wish the Vatican would start getting tougher on the pro-choice Catholics, and tell them either stop voting pro-choice, or leave the church.

This, I think, gets to the problem that some have with the issue.

Do people have cause to be concerned that a judge or politician or whatever, will change his or her stand on an issue to conform it to the teaching of the church, in the case of Catholicism, the church being a foreign governmental entity, so as not to run the risk of being kicked out of a church they may view as very important to their lives?

In other words, while a person of any denomination may be subject to threats or blackmail to change their position on something or risk getting kicked out, are catholic politicians or judges more of a concern because the church is a foreign government as well?
66 posted on 08/02/2005 10:10:28 AM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee

I hear you! God Bless Bishop Burke! Good for him, way to stand up! I saw the article.


67 posted on 08/02/2005 10:13:23 AM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
...are catholic politicians or judges more of a concern because the church is a foreign government as well?

Good question.

I think that if you're looking for the salvation of your soul, and following the laws set down by God, wouldn't it be more logical to put your first allegiance to the thing most important in your life, that is the hope of getting to Heaven.

What Christ said 2000 years ago holds just as much weight today as it did when he was addressing the Sahendrin:

"What profits a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul."

68 posted on 08/02/2005 10:43:47 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Kelly_2000; kstewskis; Victoria Delsoul; NYer
Ping!

Interesting discussion.

69 posted on 08/02/2005 10:45:08 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee

"What Christ said 2000 years ago holds just as much weight today as it did when he was addressing the Sahendrin."

Indeed! :)


70 posted on 08/02/2005 10:59:58 AM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee

Have any of you Catholics wondered why they never talk about hell anymore? Why no one talks about sin and just what is sin and the importance of confession? At our parish one priest is from India and seems to be rather nice but I can't understand much of what he says. The other priest it seems to be so casual, and starts out with a joke. Life is hard and difficult and sin is all around us, what is so funny? And do any other christians hear about hell from their churches? You would think that when dying one possiably going to hell because of sin would be of great discussion. God has great mercy but also great justice.


71 posted on 08/02/2005 12:52:20 PM PDT by red irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: red irish
Hell is always in the back of my mind, for in order to have good there must be evil.

You are so right, in this era of PC it is never mentioned in most conversations.

Certainly any good priest, or minister, worth his salt must consider hell an important topic of discussion for any faith.

Fortunately over the years We have been reminded of the existance of Hell, and that as you say God has great mercy, so does he have justice.

Anyone that sugar coats religion, and doesn't mention hell is doing a great dis-service not only to themselves, but to God as well.

72 posted on 08/02/2005 2:03:45 PM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: red irish
My Priest brings up Hell fairly regular, actually. I guess more need to.
73 posted on 08/02/2005 2:52:59 PM PDT by defconw (ALLEN IN 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC; Northern Yankee
Do people have cause to be concerned that a judge or politician or whatever, will change his or her stand on an issue to conform it to the teaching of the church, in the case of Catholicism, the church being a foreign governmental entity, so as not to run the risk of being kicked out of a church they may view as very important to their lives?

In other words, while a person of any denomination may be subject to threats or blackmail to change their position on something or risk getting kicked out, are catholic politicians or judges more of a concern because the church is a foreign government as well?

As long as Judge Roberts is a strict Constitutionalist as promised by the President, I don't see how being a Catholic in any way changes the main objective which is: someone who can interpret the law as it was intended by our Founder Fathers, considering that most of them were devoted Christians.

What GW wants, is a Judge who applies the law consistent with the original intentions of the Founders, and doesn't rule from the bench disregarding the rule of law, and abusing his/her power by entrenching the rights, stability, and protection of ordinary citizens as most Liberal Judges do.

Even though the Catholic Church doesn't interfere in judicial reviews or government's decisions, the hostility against Catholics is patently clear.

Yet to this day, the truth still remains as George Washington expressed in his farewell address:

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and Morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men and Citizens. ... And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."

74 posted on 08/02/2005 7:29:00 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Great answer!

Judge Robert Borke was on C-Span yesterday and was asked if there would be a conflict with Roberts and his Catholic faith. Borke responded that no where in the Catholic faith does it re-evaluate constitutional law. If anything things become un-constitutional when basic rights are denied.

Roe Vs. Wade would be a prime example.

75 posted on 08/03/2005 4:46:56 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson