Why would you want to chase a cartoonlike straw-man misrepresentation of what evolutionary biology actually maintains?
Folks, if you're going to try to critique science -- or even ridicule it -- it would help if you actually learned at least a little bit of it, so that your remarks are vaguely on target, instead of just expressions of your own misunderstanding.
It states the same thing it just suggest it had lots of time and random changes to accomplish it. Cold fusion with no evidence tried to make the same claim that something spontaneously changed. But you don't see that held up as an example of stunning science. The fact is all evolution has ever been is a rationalization for athiests to ignore God. Now, like homosexuals, they feel the need to enforce their 'theory' on schoolchildren and insist religious folk accept it.
Humor requires an element of "truth" to be funny. Or at least what the listener understands as "truth".
For such a statement (about the spontaneously morphed ape) to be funny, the listener would have to have a very inaccurate understanding of what evolution is.
Unfortunatly, there may be a great number of those kinds of people. Our science education has been about as bad as it can get.