Oh what a big fat hog. What about Mary Jo's "cramped" civil rights? Creep!
kennedeee questioned Roberts about human rights???????????? Is that a joke or what? Who can take this jerk seriously. He leaves a woman in a car that just went off a bridge and then has the gall to ask a dignified, gentleman like Judge Roberts a question about human rights? The man is dillusional folks not to mention a disgrace to our country.
kennedeee questioned Roberts about human rights???????????? Is that a joke or what? Who can take this jerk seriously. He leaves a woman in a car that just went off a bridge and then has the gall to ask a dignified, gentleman like Judge Roberts a question about human rights? The man is dillusional folks not to mention a disgrace to our country.
Just because activist democrats would take their personal feelings into account when ruling on cases doesn't make it right.
Second, anybody find this statement silly:
"limited and targeted on cases related to the Constitution."
Do democrats think that the constitution is something that only rarely applies?
Kennedy Questions Roberts on Civil Rights ("rather cramped view of the Voting Rights Act.".......
Posted by Sub-DriverOn News/Activism 07/28/2005 4:08:17 PM CDT · 12 replies · 210+ views
Kennedy Questions Roberts on Civil Rights ("rather cramped view of the Voting Rights Act.".......
Posted by Sub-DriverOn News/Activism 07/28/2005 4:08:17 PM CDT · 12 replies · 210+ views
""documents made public to date indicate the Supreme Court nominee holds a "rather cramped view of the Voting Rights Act.""
DO the documents indicate this? Or, does this piece of work's perception of the documents indicate this? Is he trying to fool us commoners??? What would us ignorant people do without HIM to interpret all for us?? I bet, I read these documents and they indicate something else altogether...
""documents made public to date indicate the Supreme Court nominee holds a "rather cramped view of the Voting Rights Act.""
DO the documents indicate this? Or, does this piece of work's perception of the documents indicate this? Is he trying to fool us commoners??? What would us ignorant people do without HIM to interpret all for us?? I bet, I read these documents and they indicate something else altogether...
Is he the same guy who drove off a bridge with a passenger and and did not make immediate efforts to rescue her or to get help? Did he go to sleep and wake up much later in the morning? I am not an expert of his life, so correct me if I am wrong.
Maybe he is not fit to hold one of the highest offices of public trust. If he had any shame, he would shut up and listen with admiration to better men and women who have spent their entire adult life trying to do things right.
This is a little like Paris Hilton questioning Mother Teresa on morality.