Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

You know, losing a son in a sledding accident is a horrendous thing: I can't even imagine what that would feel like. But we do have to be careful when assigning blame. Simon Lessard's safety was not and never was the responsibility of the City of Gatineau; it was his own and that of his parents. We can't ever make our society 100 percent safe, even if we banned rock-climbing, snowmobing, skiing, ice hockey, horseback riding, auto racing, go-carting, fishing and swimming, because accidents are just an unfortunate part of an active life. What we can do, however, is learn from these tragedies and impress upon other people what we have learned. To sue the government for negligence is tantamount to saying that we surrender as individuals.
1 posted on 07/27/2005 11:43:02 AM PDT by Stevieboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Stevieboy
You got that right. And if they REALLY aren't doing it for the money, then I'm sure they will be happy to donate any award they get from this lawsuit to an appropriate charity.

But for some strange reason I doubt that will happen.

2 posted on 07/27/2005 11:45:16 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

We SHOULD ban snowmobing, I don't know anybody who has anything positive to say about it.


3 posted on 07/27/2005 11:47:20 AM PDT by biggerten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

Clearly, we just need to cut down all the trees. They create a patently unsafe environment, no matter where they're growing. And if it'll save just one life, then it'll be worth it. It's for the children, after all.


5 posted on 07/27/2005 11:48:45 AM PDT by Slainte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

"We're not doing it for the money, we're doing it for our son," said Lessard.


{sigh}


8 posted on 07/27/2005 11:52:33 AM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

I see their point. If that tree had been planted 3 feet in any direction instead of where it was, this tragedy would never have happened. (sarc)


9 posted on 07/27/2005 11:53:33 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

BAN SLEDDING! "If it saves just one child..."


10 posted on 07/27/2005 11:53:49 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

Well this is going to confuse the George W. Bush haters.

He is supposedly trying to rid the world of trees so they can't pin this one on him!


11 posted on 07/27/2005 11:53:56 AM PDT by Gator101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

Well, I went and read the whole article and I still don't quite follow what excatly they're suing for - $100,000 each for mother and father and $25,000 for their daughter, but for what?

In any case, their claim that the city is somehow at fault for having trees on this hill is ridiculous - if anything it is obviously the responsibility of those going sledding, or their parents in this case, to choose a venue for sledding without any solid ojbects in the way that they might run into. AND, the city had signs posted that the hill was not meant for tobogganing.


12 posted on 07/27/2005 11:54:55 AM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

Isn't it about time that we all accepted resposibility for our own actions and not blame everyone else.


16 posted on 07/27/2005 12:04:11 PM PDT by concordKIWI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

The only way to stop these lawsuits is for them to start turning around and counter-suing. It was up to the parents to make the initial determination of the safety of the area. If they had concerns, the son wouldn't have been there.


17 posted on 07/27/2005 12:05:55 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

I had a friend crippled surfing in "hurricane" surf can his family sue the countries this storm originated from ?


23 posted on 07/27/2005 12:11:41 PM PDT by kendu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

Wow. Darwin at work.

Where was the parental supervision? Why is there no countersuit by the city against the parents for clean-up costs, mental anguish of city workers, etc.?


28 posted on 07/27/2005 12:18:46 PM PDT by Triggerhippie (Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy
A STATEMENT THAT IS ALWAYS FALSE:

We're not doing it for the money...

29 posted on 07/27/2005 12:19:34 PM PDT by Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy
"We're not doing it for the money, we're doing it for our son," said Lessard.

Then don't accept any money and get a free lawyer.

30 posted on 07/27/2005 12:21:04 PM PDT by Triggerhippie (Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

Do they sue each other over hockey injuries too? I mean seriously, those long sticks and sharp skates and slippery ice have got to go.


31 posted on 07/27/2005 12:22:28 PM PDT by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy
launched a lawsuit against the City of Gatineau in the hope that no one else will ever be allowed to enjoy sledding.

Seriously, in NY we have laws against it and you can be arrested. What used to be the funnest part of winter is now outlawed.

33 posted on 07/27/2005 12:24:16 PM PDT by bird4four4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy
"We're not doing it for the money, we're doing it for our son," said Lessard.

Really? How does that work?

Does winning a lawsuit somehow improve his son's standing in the afterworld?

38 posted on 07/27/2005 12:45:03 PM PDT by Egon (By the way, I took the liberty of fertilizing your caviar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

The city should sue the parents for a million dollars for failing to act like parents resulting in the death of their son and smearing the good name of the city.


39 posted on 07/27/2005 12:45:26 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stevieboy

Maybe the city should put 3' concrete barriers around the trees, and paint them red. Then nobody could run into the trees.

Or, if people think the concrete barriers are too dangerous, maybe a 6' barbed wire fence would work.

How about planting so damned many trees, boulders and brambles on the hill that they can't get their sleds up it to slide down the 'no sliding' zone?


40 posted on 07/27/2005 2:12:17 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The world needs more work horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson