I DID A SEARCH, and found one post, from World Net Daily. This if from the local paper there. (read more at link) I know Roger Hedgecock has mentioned this today on the EIB.
1 posted on
07/27/2005 11:17:58 AM PDT by
HeadOn
To: HeadOn
"It still doesn't mean a damn thing."An attorney holding forth on the will of the people.
2 posted on
07/27/2005 11:31:58 AM PDT by
clintonh8r
(Liberals preach comity and practice calumny.)
To: HeadOn
I wonder when they will sue to change the name to Diego?
To: Jay777
Thomas More Law Center in the news ping
5 posted on
07/27/2005 11:55:07 AM PDT by
EdReform
(Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your financial support!)
To: HeadOn
actually givent the AGE of the display, under the recent decision the cross should stay.
It is old. prior to 1989 nobody but this busybody objected so it is "institutional" as a memorial.
That lawyer is no lawyer.
To: HeadOn
"It still doesn't mean a damn thing," he said. "Voters should have never voted on it. It's a waste of taxpayers' money."Oh, really? Who died and made you dictator, bub?
11 posted on
07/27/2005 12:22:35 PM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: HeadOn
"It still doesn't mean a damn thing," he said. "Voters should have never voted on it. It's a waste of taxpayers' money."
This is a perfect example of the Creed of liberals and why they are so desperate to keep control of the over reaching courts. The will of the people be damned! They know what's best for us.
14 posted on
07/27/2005 5:21:52 PM PDT by
Round 9
To: HeadOn
Cross, federal property, (Arlington, VA). When are they going to demand that these be removed because they are offensive?
15 posted on
07/27/2005 5:50:55 PM PDT by
TASMANIANRED
(Democrats haven't had a new idea since Karl Marx.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson