That's because the editor of the Biblical Arch. Review is also complicit. He turns out to be a total huckster.
That seems to be a rather harsh judgment on your part. Why do you say he is complicit. He makes some pretty compelling arguments for not accepting at face value the judgement of the Israeli Antiquities Authority. Whether you like the man or not (he is flamboyant) he makes some good points in defending the authenticity of the ossuary. Besides, he is not alone. At least read Golan's defense at http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/bswbOOossuary_Golan_Cornerstone.pdf. All the information is there.