Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem Strategist Suggests on MSNBC that President May Be Focus of Leak Probe
MSNBC News | 07/16/2005 | MSNBC

Posted on 07/16/2005 7:55:07 AM PDT by RightFighter

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400401-409 last
To: Once-Ler
In order to believe this you would have to believe CNN also put Buchanan on the air to make Republicans look bad.

Ya think?! They all trot him out as a conservative who conveniently seems to disagree with the Administration more often than not.

According to the drugged up freaks at DU, CNN and MSNBC, along with CBS, NBC, and ABC, are run by the big money capitalist corporations. They are only interested in propping up Dubya's failed administration.

I don't care what the DU thinks about anything.

Surprisingly the corporate sponsored media is incredibly inept and misguidedly at the forefront of the push to impeach Bush for the dastardly crime of being a Republican.

It's not "the corporate sponsored media", it's the corporate-owned media. There's a difference and it became evident when Time magazine crapped on Matthew Cooper and released his emails. Regardless, the people actually running the media are agenda-driven liberals. That's obvious.

401 posted on 07/17/2005 10:23:51 AM PDT by blake6900 (YOUR AD HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
"...if I were a betting man I would put real money on there being 3 and maybe even 4 high court nominations for Bush to make."

The more the better, to a point. If there is only one, which I doubt, he will nominate a real conservative. If there is more I really believe GWB will try to appease the moderate left with 1 pick. If there is more who knows who he may feel he needs to pacify.
402 posted on 07/17/2005 11:38:37 AM PDT by hophead ("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter

Could minor Ambassador Joe Wilson himself have been the source in blowing his own Wife's cover?

It is distinctly possible, (though it may be unlikely that Joe Wilson himself directly was NY Times Judith Miller's source), since Joe Wilson himself evidently routinely bragged openly to strangers about her CIA employment, prior to such "cover" being "blown" in the press.

Here's an example of Joe's apparently routine and open bragging about Valerie being a "CIA agent," which became known directly to me over a year ago:

He certainly bragged about it per a famous and highly reliable source's (named below) account of his own face-to-face encounter with Amb. Joe Wilson prior to Valerie Plame's "outing" as a CIA agent/employee.

Based upon a personal conversation (we were in a small group eating; it was NOT an "off the record") I had with eminent historian Victor Davis Hanson (we were at a luncheon table together during a trip to Europe), it appeared entirely possible that Joe Wilson himself was the (or one source, if not the original one) possible source in revealing his own wife's status as a CIA agent or employee.

Victor Davis Hanson (Wilson presumably knew Victor Davis Hanson wrote regularly for NRO (National Review Online), had done OpEds for the Wall street Journal, and other publications, and had his own Website with a widespread following) said he (VDH) & Joe Wilson were both in the same "Green Room" before a televised debate-discussion on Iraq, etc. and Joe first warned the TV make-up person not to get powder on his $14,000 Rolex watch, then he bragged to Victor about several things (possessions and trips to Aspen, etc.), like his expensive car (I think it was a Mercedes), and then bragged about his beautiful wife who, Joe Wilson said (braggingly) was a CIA operative.

I asked Victor Davis Hanson Why he didn't write up this account.(?) He replied that Joe Wilson would probably simply deny it, since only he (VDH) & Joe Wilson were in the Green Room together before the broadcast.

However, it is now easy to surmise that Joe Wilson is a crass, materialistic, self-promoting, vain, egotistical, bragaddocio-opportunist, so this account is perfectly consistent with Valerie Plame's TWO photo shoots in Vanity Fair. (Or was it Vogue? No, probably too crass for Vogue, n'est pas?)


403 posted on 07/17/2005 3:48:59 PM PDT by FReethesheeples (Gonzales appears to be quite WEAK on Property rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

I never said that, but I rest my case.


404 posted on 07/17/2005 9:04:17 PM PDT by Atchafalaya (When you're there that's the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Your agenda(s), option(s), solution(s), plan(S), quick fixes are?? I ain't 100% happy. But, but
Maybe John Kerry and the rational Democrats would be doing a better job? HUH?

Lets stay together here. The prize is in sight; the Court.
The Court is what this had been about since Bush day one; there is nothing more important than this short of nuclear war.
405 posted on 07/17/2005 9:46:27 PM PDT by Atchafalaya (When you're there that's the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: Atchafalaya
"Your agenda(s), option(s), solution(s), plan(S), quick fixes are?? I ain't 100% happy."

1) Secure the d@mn border once and for all and stop making a mockery out of the term "War on Terror."

2) Cut the out-of-control domestic socialist spending.

3) Stop pandering to Bono and and Internationalists who whine that the U.S. isn't fulfilling it's part regarding foreign aid.

4) Step into the fray and staunchly defend conservative ideology, and his own integrity from the likes of Kennedy, Schumer, Clinton, etal.

5)Stop kissing the @ss of Vincente Fox, and maligning patriots like the Minutemen. Dubya Bush is making it far too obvious he's a Globalist -- NOT a U.S. Sovereignist.

"Maybe John Kerry and the rational Democrats would be doing a better job? HUH?"

No, but your point is well taken -- the choice between Bush and Kerry was about the lesser of two evils.

"Lets stay together here. The prize is in sight; the Court. The Court is what this had been about since Bush day one; there is nothing more important than this short of nuclear war."

On this we agree.

However, there is NOTHING, however, that convinces me that Dubya Bush will indeed infuse the SCOTUS with constitutionist conservatives.

406 posted on 07/18/2005 3:10:13 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I don't have to tell you what you already know, it is what you "believe" that is wrong and troubling.


407 posted on 07/18/2005 6:57:02 AM PDT by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]

To: Final Authority

I guess you mean it's "wrong and troubling" because I don't believe the same things you believe.

The rest of us live in the real world.


408 posted on 07/18/2005 7:55:09 AM PDT by Howlin (Is Valerie Plame a mute?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

Looks like we find out about SCOTUS tomorrow; fingers crossed.


409 posted on 07/18/2005 9:52:10 PM PDT by Atchafalaya (When you're there that's the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400401-409 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson