Posted on 07/08/2005 1:32:55 PM PDT by WmShirerAdmirer
(CNSNews.com) - The British Broadcasting Corporation Thursday dropped its customary stance on using the words "terrorist" and "terror" in its coverage of the deadly bombings in London.
News stories included references to "terror attacks on London" and "a series of terrorist attacks on London's public transport system."
Media watchdogs have for years taken issue with the BBC, along with other news organizations such as Reuters, for a reluctance to call deadly attacks against civilians terrorism.
In its coverage of Palestinian suicide bombings, for instance, the broadcaster uses words like "bomber" and "militant" to describe those who detonate bombs that kill and maim Israeli civilians.
Last year a group called BBCWatch.com criticized the BBC's reluctance to use the words "terrorist" in reference to Palestinian suicide bombings.
"We consider that the way in which the BBC refrains from labeling as 'terrorist' certain groups attacking Israelis is discriminatory, inaccurate and impartial," the group said in a report.
Another group, Honest Reporting, noted an instance in late 2001 when the BBC did not describe suicide bombings which killed 26 civilians in Jerusalem and Haifa as "terrorism," but then used the word "terror" in a headline describing retaliatory Israeli raids in Gaza.
BBC editorial guidelines warn staff against "the careless use of words which carry emotional or value judgments."
"The word 'terrorist' itself can be a barrier rather than an aid to understanding," the guidelines say. "We should try to avoid the term, without attribution. We should let other people characterize while we report the facts as we know them."
"We should use words which specifically describe the perpetrator such as 'bomber,' 'attacker,' 'gunman,' 'kidnapper,' 'insurgent,' and 'militant.' Our responsibility is to remain objective and report in ways that enable our audiences to make their own assessments about who is doing what to whom."
The Malki Foundation is a charity set up by the family of a 15-year-old girl killed by Palestinian terrorists in an Aug. 2001 suicide bombing in a Jerusalem pizza parlor
Writing on the group's website Thursday, Malka Chana Roth's father Arnold said "what happened in London today was not the act of 'militants' or of 'activists' ... Let's be clear about the fact that this morning's victims in London were the direct targets of terrorists."
Roth said the BBC had for years "performed semantic acrobatics to explain why the murderers of our children are 'militant' 'activists' who must be 'understood.' "
"Terror, it is clear, is the word your audience expects you to use when the victims are your colleagues, neighbors and friends," he said.
Media watchdogs have for years taken issue with the BBC, along with other news organizations such as Reuters, for a reluctance to call deadly attacks against civilians terrorism.
Finally the BBC is calling "it" as it is!!! (no Clinton pun intended)
Damn.. that really is big news.
Even Livingston (Kook-left London mayor) called terrorism terrorism, and sounded even like Winston Churchill. Britian is being transformed as we speak.
And we have people in "The Greatest Deliberative Body In the World" who can't say --terrorist!
But I guess even they don't bomb their allies.
Thee BBC will be back to form shortly.
It may be "terrorism" when the Islamists attack London, but don't hold your breath for them to call the next attack on Israeli women and children terrorism.
Will wonders never cease.
it's only terrorism when it happens to them, if it happens to us...
we deserved it, and the terrorists are freedom fighters.
As the thumbscrews turn....
(Even Livingston (Kook-left London mayor) called terrorism terrorism, and sounded even like Winston Churchill. Britian is being transformed as we speak.)
That's what we thought about Democrats after 9/11. The minute the public started to forget, they reverted back to form and started again spewing anti-American hatred. A few libs actually were transformed, but not the majority of them. The good news is that we don't need a majority of them to start seeing the light before they start losing elections left and right.
What?! They're not "activists"?!
How long before the BBC starts blaming Bush?
They are freedom fighting insurgents.
But I thought the BBC said, "One man's terrorist is another man's 'freedom fighter.'"
Guess they got the wake up call. Reuters is still ignoring the obvious, tho.
And BBC probably calls Muhammad Atta a "passenger-pilot".
The bloody Beeb is doing more to encourage terrorists in the UK than half the Arab wogs floating around there. Damn socialists!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.