Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

On Friday, I broke the story...

WHAT "STORY" -- that Rove already gave permission to all reporters to disclose their conversations of long ago? (You forgot to "break" that story.) That there are SEVERAL sources YET to be revealed by Cooper's notes? (You forgot to "break" that story, too.) Hello, Lawrence, come back to Planet Earth someday. You broke nothing except your reputation. (Although freepers already had you correctly pegged, I have to be honest!)
1 posted on 07/03/2005 10:14:42 AM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: cyncooper

FYI.


2 posted on 07/03/2005 10:15:14 AM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

O'Donnell never has shied away from making a jacka$$ of himself, has he?


3 posted on 07/03/2005 10:16:48 AM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

Creepy Liar!


4 posted on 07/03/2005 10:17:46 AM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
Dear Lawrence:

Thank you.

6 posted on 07/03/2005 10:19:34 AM PDT by JOE6PAK ("a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

For all I know Lawrence O'Donnell may have a point but I think he's also a few steps away from a padded room.


7 posted on 07/03/2005 10:23:38 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
I thought o'donnell was in a straight jacket somewhere
9 posted on 07/03/2005 10:25:33 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
Read the following sentence carefully, paying no attention to content, and tell me Lawrence O'Donnell is a professional writer!

"On Friday, I broke the story that the e-mails that Time turned over to the prosecutor that day reveal that Karl Rove is the source Matt Cooper is protecting "

"That" is one of my pet peeves!

(Now, with THAT off my chest, I'll try to read the damn thing for content.)

10 posted on 07/03/2005 10:26:26 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@I Will Support President Bush on his Supreme Court nominees.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
LOL! What an idiot!

Uh, I mean, what an insightful and sober analyst. Please, MSM, give O'Donnell plenty of page space and screen time to elaborate his delusional bullshi..., er, devastating bombshell about Rove. Yeah, that's the ticket!

11 posted on 07/03/2005 10:26:43 AM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

If the Dems boot Howard Dean, I hope Lawrence will get the job. He'd be so perfect.


12 posted on 07/03/2005 10:27:50 AM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
"This is highly unlikely. Prosecutors have absolutely no control over what witnesses say when they leave the grand jury room. Rove can tell us word-for-word what he said to the grand jury and would if he thought it would help him."

Prosecutors ask witnesses all the time not to reveal their testimony, just out of courtesy to protect their investigations. Rove probably has no issue in doing so because not only would he like himself like to get to the bottom of things, but also I don't think Rove would care to piss off a federal prosecutor with such wide discretion. And, of course, is Cooper going to jail protecting a source who isn't asking to be protected? Sheesh, what a shmuck O'donnell is.

13 posted on 07/03/2005 10:28:01 AM PDT by Catphish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer



ODONNELL IS A CREEPY LIAR!

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/09/29/novak.cia/

"Wilson at one point suggested that senior Bush adviser Karl Rove could have been behind the leak, which the White House denied. He backed off that assertion somewhat Monday, accusing Rove of at least condoning it."

Even JOE WILSON admitted it wasn't Rove - in 2003!


15 posted on 07/03/2005 10:29:10 AM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

This guy never heard of a "gag order"? Yikes.


16 posted on 07/03/2005 10:29:18 AM PDT by Mr. Buzzcut (metal god ... visit The Ponderosa .... www.vandelay.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
Prosecutors have absolutely no control over what witnesses say when they leave the grand jury room.

Hogwash! I spend years on a federal grand jury and all who participated as jury or witnesses were admonished not to discuss anything that occurred in the room.

17 posted on 07/03/2005 10:32:16 AM PDT by debg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
Prosecutors have absolutely no control over what witnesses say when they leave the grand jury room.

Hogwash! I spend years on a federal grand jury and all who participated as jury or witnesses were admonished not to discuss anything that occurred in the room.

18 posted on 07/03/2005 10:32:16 AM PDT by debg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
This guy is one of the most insanely delusional journalist in America. He and Keith Olbermann will be competing on the kook journalist of the year award. Olbermann won in 2004 because of his utter delusional reporting on the Ohio votes.
20 posted on 07/03/2005 10:35:48 AM PDT by jveritas (The left cannot win a national election ever again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
Well, for one thing, O'Donnell doesn't quote the rest of Luskin's statement: Namely, that the prosecutor told Rove he is not the target of the investigation.

And it's quite telling I think, for O'Donnell to mention "traction for his story". Obviously, "traction" to malign Rove is what is on his mind.

Less than an hour ago, I watched a replay of O'Donnell on The McLaughlin Group. O'Donnell said himself he didn't think Rove could be prosecuted for outting an operative, rather he thinks Fitzgerald is going after Rove on perjury charges.

21 posted on 07/03/2005 10:35:58 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@I Will Support President Bush on his Supreme Court nominees.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

bump


22 posted on 07/03/2005 10:36:29 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

I hereby invoke the "Chewbacca Defense". "Look at the monkey!"

24 posted on 07/03/2005 10:48:00 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

On other boards they already have Rove impeached, or no, wait, Bush, Ooooh, I F&$(*%$ hate the all SOOO BAD!!!


28 posted on 07/03/2005 11:01:31 AM PDT by anonymous_user (You gotta be passionate about something. I guess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
On Saturday, Luskin decided to reveal that Rove did have at least one conversation with Cooper,

Yeah, Larry, they decided to "reveal" this for the umpteenth time.

Here's a liberal column from over a year ago:

More details emerge on the Plame investigation, as Karl Rove's testimony is revealed for the first time.

March 8, 2004

President Bush's chief political adviser, Karl Rove, told the FBI in an interview last October that he circulated and discussed damaging information regarding CIA operative Valerie Plame with others in the White House, outside political consultants, and journalists, according to a government official and an attorney familiar with the ongoing special counsel's investigation of the matter.

But Rove also adamantly insisted to the FBI that he was not the administration official who leaked the information that Plame was a covert CIA operative to conservative columnist Robert Novak last July. Rather, Rove insisted, he had only circulated information about Plame after it had appeared in Novak's column. He also told the FBI, the same sources said, that circulating the information was a legitimate means to counter what he claimed was politically motivated criticism of the Bush administration by Plame's husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson.

~snip~

The characterizations in the 2004 citation are the lefty pov, but the bare facts are what we've long known and O'Donnell (and Newsweek) provided nothing new.

The 2004 column goes on to darkly mention Scooter Libby who has long since been cleared after he, like Rove, signed confidentiality waivers and reporters were compelled (and they fought it every step of the way) to admit Libby was not the source and you can bet that the reporters that have testified so far have cleared Rove, as well.

Thank you very much for the ping.

30 posted on 07/03/2005 11:08:01 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson