The current Iranian environment minister, Massoumeh Ebtekar, was the chief interpreter and spokeswoman for the radical students who took over the US Embassy and held 52 diplomats hostage for 444 days. Posted on 07/01/2005 10:14:38 AM PDT by M. Espinola
WASHINGTON - If the newly elected Iranian president turns out to have been a main participant in the holding of American hostages in Teheran, he won’t be the first top Iranian official with a role in the 1979 crisis.
The current Iranian environment minister, Massoumeh Ebtekar, was the chief interpreter and spokeswoman for the radical students who took over the US Embassy and held 52 diplomats hostage for 444 days.
Dubbed “Sister Mary” by the American press because her heavy head scarf resembled a nun’s habit, Ebtekar gave almost nightly interviews during the standoff, denouncing the hostages as spies and accusing the United States of committing crimes.
Five former US hostages who saw Iranian president-elect Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in photos or on television said they believe he was among the hostage-takers. One said he was interrogated by Ahmadinejad.
The White House said Thursday it was taking their statements seriously. President George W. Bush said “many questions” were raised by the allegations of the former hostages. The State Department said it is investigating.
Ebtekar, who is also one of Iran’s six vice presidents, has been the highest-ranking woman in the moderate-leaning government of President Mohammad Khatami.
She acknowledged her part in the US Embassy takeover in remarks to reporters in 1998.
“The generation that is in executive and policy-making jobs is a revolutionary generation that played an active role in every stage of the revolution,” Ebtekar said then.
A report in The New York Times that year had detailed her involvement, which was not listed on Ebtekar’s biography.
Students’ voice
She was an 18-year-old freshman at Polytechnic University in Teheran when she became the public voice of the student takeover. She spoke English better than others in the student group because she had lived in suburban Philadelphia as a child and had attended American schools.
She once told an ABC News reporter that she could imagine being provoked into killing the hostages.
“Yes,” she said. “When I’ve seen an American gun being lifted up and killing my brothers and sisters in the streets, of course.”
Some of the former students have said Ahmadinejad opposed the takeover even though he was a member of the hard-line Islamic student group that seized the embassy.
In the turbulent early days of Iran’s Islamic Revolution, Ahmadinejad was more concerned with putting down leftists and communists at universities than striking at Americans, former students said. During the long standoff, he was writing and speaking against leftist students, they said.
It is unclear whether the Bush administration had explored previously whether Ahmadinejad was involved in the hostage episode. National security adviser Stephen Hadley said Thursday that the United States has followed his career. “Obviously, one of the things you do when you get a report like this is look back and see what you have in the files and that’s the process that’s going on now,” he said.
Hadley said the White House was looking into the photographs and had not reached any conclusions. “They are allegations at the present time,” he said. “We need to get the facts.”
Hadley stressed that the United States would have to deal with Ahmadinejad, even if the administration did not approve of the way he was elected. Bush denounced the election, saying it was designed to maintain power in the hands of an unelected few who denied ballot access to more than 1,000 people who wanted to run.
graphics added
From pictures I have seen of the new Iranian leader and the hostage taker the hostages are claiming is him, they are not the same person.
No way they are the same person.
He had a reverse nose job.
You're looking at the wrong man. The other pictures are here on FR.
Whether or not Ahmadinejad was directly involved in the taking of American diplomatic hostages in 1979, he is still a very dangerous Islamic radical, and an arch enemy of the civilized world.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1434542/posts
You're right. That's not the same guy.
Go to the link above.
THAT'S the guy.
More reason that wether or not he was a hostage taker doesn't matter. He could have been or he could have been on vacation somewhere the entire time and he is just as much an enemy of America.
What would Jimmy Carter do?
bttt
The main focus should be toppling the current pro-terrorist régime before they nuke someone.
He already did it - thanks for nothing Jimmy..
Ditto!
"She spoke English better than others in the student group because she had lived in suburban Philadelphia as a child and had attended American schools"
Showing yet again the stunning idiocy of naive liberal internationalists who frequently assert (devoid of any evidence) that allowing Muslims to emigrate to or visit the west somehow breeds tolerance and understanding. Many of the worst Islamo-fascist fanatics have had extensive first-hand experience of the US and/or Europe. We have helped our worst enemies to know us better, infiltrate us better, etc. Spending time in our countries, learning the language(s) and culture, etc. just helps many Muslims react in revulsion to western materialism, pop culture, etc. Mohammed Atta and his ilk are not liberalized by their immersion in western culture - quite the opposite many times.....
This is very true, and is not something that I've seen examined. Most of the worst of the terrorists have had extensive contact with western culture.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
