Posted on 06/30/2005 8:11:43 AM PDT by CHARLITE
Sorry....I get her and Barbara Boxer mixed up sometimes.
"Why aren't these empty suits and empty dresses humiliated by their own profound IGNORANCE?"
Because they are ignorant?
That's easy to do. They are both Marxists and are fugly to boot.
This really clouds their thinking and makes them do silly and foolish things. The are self-destructing and that's fine with me. I welcome more idiocy from them.
You know...this is exactly what they did during the first Gulf War, when we had Saddams Republican Guard on the run. The media turned the Highway of Death into an Abu Ghraib spectacle as they molded public opinion against us dealing Saddam a fatal blow. And then, these same liberals have the nerve to question why we didn't finish Saddam the first time around.
She looks like she died and was re-animated.
They have to realize that their actions have consequences.
I think they know that full well, though.
A friend saw her in Marin County last year.
She said Pelosi Galore looks like a woman who has had the last plastic surgery that can be performed on her and made Joan Rivers look like a virgin to plastic surgery.
Nope. That was Hal Linden.
A.A.C.
What generation? Obviously, in context, the generation that would see the signs—chief among them the rebirth of Israel. A generation in the Bible is something like forty years. If this is a correct deduction, then within forty years or so of 1948, all these things could take place. Many scholars who have studied Bible prophecy all their lives believe that this is so.”
Surprisingly, though, even though I have never been a Lindsey admirer, I liked what he said in the article about the rebuilding of the Temple not to be found anywhere in the NT.
It's not ignorance; it's a calculated disinformation campaign to demoralize the country with the hope of wresting control and eventually enslaving the citizens...
That was Hal Linden. I must admit though, they do even look a little alike. Must be that they both have the heavy mustache. (I really loved that show)
Thanks for the ping!
From Lindsey: "Obviously, in context, the generation that would see the signs—chief among them the rebirth of Israel. A generation in the Bible is something like forty years. If this is a correct deduction, then within forty years or so of 1948, all these things could take place. Many scholars who have studied Bible prophecy all their lives believe that this is so."
It's kinda hard to put a man on trial for making a false prediction when he puts a gigantic caveat like that and then says only that it could indicate the date range in which everything will take place. Perhaps Lindsey should have been more creative with the fonts to make sure that those so eager to crucify him wouldn't miss a couple of key clauses in this passage. Perhaps those so eager to do so should learn the difference between a prediction and a speculation.
Now, you said in post #7 that Hal "keeps missing the date he prophesies the end of the world will happen..." That means that you must have multiple examples. So tell me, what other dates has Hal "predicted"?
Btw, I should point out that while I like Lindsey and Missler both (and I've had occassion to meet and converse with the latter, and I can say without reservation that he is a scholar and a gentleman), I've got grave reservations myself about Hal's tendency to compare Scripture-to-technology before he finishes comparing Scripture-to-Scripture and I disagree with him that the Rapture will be pretrib and separated from the Second Coming sequence, so don't take my response as putting me in his camp.
However, I do get tired of the false accusations thrown carelessly around by his critics. Perhaps they should concentrate on demonstrating the validity of their own beliefs instead of simply throwing mud on the opposition.
Not a huge follower of Lindsey myself (I prefer Missler as well), but it irks me whenever Lindsey's name is mentioned here and he is dismissed out of hand as a quack when he raises many a good point.
It just happens that the war is being fought in Iraq, but I suppose that is much too deep a distinction for her to grasp. Our forces aren't fighting against Iraq. Al-Qaida is fighting against Iraq. Our forces are fighting against al-Qaida in Iraq.Opinions are now facts? He knows this how? From listening to the 'right' politician?
Lest we forget we have all the information provided on the links I've seen posted time and time again. Of course one could ask if these links were so defined, surely the President or someone in the administration would provide definitive proof. Or are they just disseminating the info through such fine upstanding 'conservative' magazines as Weekly Standard and the National Review? How clever of them.....
And yet somehow this information was dismissed over a year ago and it's relevant now again why? Because the 'right' politician alluded to a link in his speech?
Those that claim Lindsey as a date-setter and end times snake oil salesman have yet to provide a clear example of such errors.
I suppose that's why you find most of his books on websites such as Armageddon Books. From the description of the soon to be 'classic' VANISHED INTO THIN AIR
We live in a world essentially devoid of hope. Visions of the future as portrayed by popular books and films include catastrophic events like asteroid strikes, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and plagues. Images of the future are more often than not eerie, post-apocalyptic scenes complete with darkened skies over ruined cities presided over by chaosDon't think ol' Hal's going to be spending a lot of time discussing spreading of the Gospel and how we can come to a personal relationship with Jesus Christ in this barn-burner. What was that question put forth in the description? When will it take place? Guess I'd sort of have to buy the book for Hal to tell me huh?Those images are completely in harmony with the prophecies of the Book of the Revelation for the last days. But there is another prophecy-the promise of the Rapture of the Church. What is the Rapture? Which view is correct? What are the other views? Is the Rapture a recently developed doctrine? When will it take place? Who will go? Hal Lindsey explains in clear, easy to understand terms the answers to these and many other doctrinal issues surrounding the Rapture of the Church.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.