Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair defends Iraq war, dismisses memo
Bakersfield Californian ^ | 6/29/05 | Ed Johnson - AP

Posted on 06/29/2005 10:21:53 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

LONDON (AP) - British Prime Minister Tony Blair on Wednesday defended the war in Iraq, and brushed off a new question about a government memo that suggested Washington had been determined to justify the invasion.

"I was glad that we took the action we did," Blair told the House of Commons when asked about the so-called Downing Street memo. His comments came a day after President Bush rejected suggestions that Washington set a timetable for a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq and urged patience.

According to the leaked minutes of a July 23, 2002, meeting between Blair and top government officials at his Downing Street office, Sir Richard Dearlove, then chief of Britain's intelligence service, said the White House viewed military action against Saddam Hussein as inevitable.

"Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD," read the memo, seen by The Associated Press. "But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

British lawmaker Adam Price asked Blair in the Commons on Wednesday whether he believed Dearlove was a reliable source of information on Iraq.

"Is it safe to assume that Sir Richard's statement ... that the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy was an accurate assessment of the intentions and actions of the Bush administration?" Price asked.

Blair said the contents of that memo had already been covered by a high-level independent inquiry into the British government's case for war in Iraq.

He emphasized that the 2002 meeting was before Britain and the United States sought and secured a resolution from the United Nations Security Council - a path that indicated they were not bent on military action.

"I have to say that this was of course before we went to the United Nations and secured a second resolution, the resolution 1441 that had unanimous support," Blair added.

Blair, who met Monday with Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, went on to defend the U.S.-led war.

"When I stood next to the new prime minister of Iraq, somebody who has had five of his relatives assassinated by Saddam ... and realized that he was in power because of the democratic votes of 8 million Iraqis, then I was glad that we took the action that we did and made sure that Iraq was no longer governed by a dictatorship, but by a democracy."

Details of the memo appeared in British newspapers early last month but the news in Britain quickly turned to the May 5 election that returned Blair to power.

In the United States, however, details of the memo's contents have raised criticism among opponents of the Bush administration.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blair; defends; dismisses; downingstreet; iraq; memo; memos

1 posted on 06/29/2005 10:22:03 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Saying war with Iraq is "inevitable" could simply result from a realistic view of his intransigence. He's not going to disarm, he's not going to leave, so we'll have to remove him. It's inevitable.


2 posted on 06/29/2005 10:49:38 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert56
He's not going to disarm, he's not going to leave, so we'll have to remove him. It's inevitable.

To Whom are you refering to?

3 posted on 06/29/2005 11:13:01 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Dismisses Downing Memo. Liberal/media/moderate reactions?


4 posted on 06/29/2005 12:06:38 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection (http://hour9.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
To Whom are you refering to?

Saddam. Sorry for the ambiguity.

5 posted on 06/29/2005 12:46:22 PM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson