President Bush hasn't even given his speech yet and already the media is writing post-speech analysis, lying through their teeth when they claim Bush actually said any of this. If he hasn't made the speech yet, all you can do is say you saw the written speech, not claim he made it. Tch.
About the author of this piece of crap:
Jennifer Loven, Democratic Operative
http://powerlineblog.com/archives/007959.php
This was apparently cobbled from prereleased whithouse excepts.
I Hope the Pres Wows em with the stuff he is keeping for the A material
Is the Author Miss Cleo?, The speech hasn't happened yet
I wonder why they didn't mention the most talked about moment during the speech? I would have thought for sure coverage of Durbin, having snuck in without anyone's knowledge, streaking across the stage would have received some coverage.
Still the president is giving the wrong speech at the wrong time. The public does not support an Iraq pull out and the president should focus on the next challenge, support the troops in a gung ho fashion and avoid any hand wringing. Iraq is ours, Syria, Iran, N Korea and Al Queda must be dealt with.
Somehow I think Bush will not phrase it quite that way.
Watched Speech. Also watched Clark on Fox News. He said Iraq is now a great tool for terrorist recruitment. Wasn't that the case when the Soviet's invaded Afghanistan? The Somalia mess? Suicide bombing of the USS Cole? Or taking down WTC towers?
What kind of crapweasel headline is that? The effort is worth it. He didn't say bloodshed.