Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kharaku
Unless companies are forced to use this domain, it's useless for filtering.

I agree, but I'm not sure that it couldn't be forced. We pass regulations on businesses all the time, including the porn industry. Why not force them to have the .xxx domain?

7 posted on 06/15/2005 9:54:35 AM PDT by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Bluegrass Conservative

It isn't as much a regulation problem as much as a definitional problem. How do you define "porn" or whatever material requires the xxx designation? I've stumbled across sites that have an adult content warning, which I don't know if it is required for their content or not. Perhaps if it is, there's your answer -- anything with an adult content warning = XXX. I think what some people might not like is sites that might have nude pictures (i.e. photo sites or nudist sites) being required to be a XXX.


18 posted on 06/15/2005 10:00:58 AM PDT by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

Frankly, that is the ONLY way to make filtering effective. Of course, the smut peddlers will cry over the cost of changing everything, to which I say "SO??". We had the area codes in NC changed twice in the span of a few years and businesses all over the state (except for the Capital, of course) had to change letterhead, business cards, etc. We hear about how profitable the porn business is, so what is this minimal cost to them? Not much.

They also say they aren't trying to target kids, well, this would prove it. Let ANY website that has access to nude pictures of anyone be required to use the .xxx domain. This would also discourage linking to illicit pictures on message boards and prevent some kid from putting up a personal site and giving his "friends" access to his porn scans.

If someone does put up a site where people can access nude pictures or worse, they get hit with a fine for the first offense. If they don't change or take it down within a certain time period, a BIG fine. If they do it again, or fail to take it down after another designated time, they get time in Pound-Me-In-The-Rump Prison, where their "fans" can show their appreciation for the person's handiwork.

Sorry, I work in IT and have NO tolerance for some of these smut peddlers. Access for kids to all kinds of stuff is way too easy and something needs to be done to make it more difficult.


35 posted on 06/15/2005 10:37:42 AM PDT by Littlejon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

It probably COULD be forced (if we eliminated non complying 3rd party nations from being able to sell .xxx names, and limited which ips could register).


54 posted on 06/15/2005 12:38:22 PM PDT by kharaku (G3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson