Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/11/2005 8:23:33 AM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pikamax

http://washingtontimes.com/metro/20050610-103304-8510r.htm

The book celebrates the Republican Party's anti-slavery founders and urges Republicans to challenge Democratic entitlement to the black vote.
In his letter, Mr. Lierman's cites excerpts from the book and from speeches by Mr. Zak.
For example, "Mastery over blacks has always been Democratic Policy. Before it was cotton. Now it is misery." And "Democrats are socialists and we should call them socialists. It's to the Democrats' advantage children grow up poor and uneducated."



>>>>Where is he lying?


2 posted on 06/11/2005 8:25:10 AM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

You can always tell when an arrow aimed at the libs strikes home and reveals them for what they are.

Why in the world would anyone apologize for speaking the truth?


3 posted on 06/11/2005 8:26:13 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Freedom of speech only applies when one speaks kindly of democrats or poorly of republicans.


4 posted on 06/11/2005 8:26:37 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Anyone who thinks we believe Hillary on any issue is truly a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

The Dems don't like "inflammatory language"? ? Coulda fooled me.... oh, piffle.


5 posted on 06/11/2005 8:27:06 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

"Lierman"

Hmmmm very interesting and appropriate name.


6 posted on 06/11/2005 8:29:23 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Anyone who thinks we believe Hillary on any issue is truly a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
"Democrats have nothing to offer other than angriness and name-calling," she said

Reading the article, the rats didn't offer a single factual disagreement. Typical.

8 posted on 06/11/2005 8:30:08 AM PDT by TheDon (Euthanasia is an atrocity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Democratic petition asks Steele to retract support for book on GOP, race Lierman calls publication 'divisive commentary'

ROTFLMPJO

The DUmbocRAT party is now the "deaf, DUmb, and blind party" as well.

10 posted on 06/11/2005 8:30:29 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Minuteman at heart, couch potato in reality))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

OOOOOHHHHH, the ugly truth feenzy from the Dums starts. BTW, how do the Dummy Dums explain the fact that it was the REPUBLICAN GOV of Texas during RECONSTRUCTION, that supported the founding of the FREEDMAN org in TEXAS. it is known that Republicans were lynched in Texas, along with Blacks. The numbers are more accurate for Repubs, since the DUMS would lynch blacks and bury them. The belief is that many more blacks were lynched by the Dums than is documented.


13 posted on 06/11/2005 8:33:07 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

The Democratic Party can't face the facts of its racist past...


17 posted on 06/11/2005 8:36:31 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

A little history here:

The Democratic Party is generally regarded to have originated with Andrew Jackson, a slaveholder and genocidal indian fighter.

In its early years, the Democratic Party was led by southern slaveholders and the northern merchants who relied on them.

The Confederacy was led by Democratic politicos, who couldn't stomach Lincoln's election.

After the Civil War, scores of black Republican officeholders were elected.

Reconstruction was reversed, and Jim Crow created, by the Democratic State parties in the southern States.

Northern Democrats had little use for black voters. The progressive Woodrow Wilson was a racist.

Southern Democrats successfully defeated every piece of Federal civil rights legislation, including anti-lynching laws, up until 1964.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 would not have passed without the votes of Congressional Republicans. A higher percentage of Republicans voted for it than Democrats.


20 posted on 06/11/2005 8:44:10 AM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Isiah Leggett, former head of the state Democratic Party and a law professor at Howard University, said Zak's "is an outrageous book and it belittles African-Americans and it stereotypes African-Americans."

"African-Americans up until the 1950s were Republicans. ... We switched that based on many of the things that Republicans were doing," Leggett said. "I agree with the sentiment that the book is outrageous, and it makes assumptions that we can't think, we aren't intellectual and we follow the party blindly."

And in the past half-century, the Democrats have NOT betrayed that trust placed in them, by Americans of African descent, over and over again? By the Democrats' own stereotyping, by promises made and never kept, by destroying the very structure of whole families and neighborhoods?

24 posted on 06/11/2005 8:48:36 AM PDT by alloysteel ("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

What's the book's title? I'll order it on Amazon ASAP & help bump up Lt/Guv Steele's sales!


29 posted on 06/11/2005 9:04:54 AM PDT by hispanichoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

The Dims want to hide that they are the Anti-African-American party or the We know best for African-Americans party? What a surprise.

As I posted on another thread the other day, the Dims history is:

1. 1781 to 1865, pro-slavery. That is the best for African-Americans. They can not handle being full citizens. We know best for African-Americans.. [The terrioris wing of the Dim party were patroling to stop runaway slaves.}

2. 1866 to 1955, pro-Jim Crow. That is the best for African-Americans. They can not handle being full citizens. We know best for African-Americans. [The terriorist wing of the Dim party was the KKK during this period.]

3. 1956 to the presents, The government plantantion. That is the best for African-Americans. They can not handle being full citizens. We know best African-Americans. [The terriorist wing of the party is enforcing poltical correctness and threatening GOP and conservative speakers during this period.]


30 posted on 06/11/2005 9:08:19 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Why doesn't Grand Exhalted Kleagle and Wizard of the Golden Kights of the White Magnolia of the Democrat Klan, Robert "Sheets" Byrd, simply send some of his night riders from the closest big city over to tune this guy up a little?


33 posted on 06/11/2005 9:15:15 AM PDT by Tacis ( SEAL THE FRIGGEN BORDER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

NOBODY IS ENTITLED TO THE BLACK VOTE.

Good grief! The color of a man's skin does not make him different as a voter. They want the same things that every normal person wants. A good job, a good family, maybe a business of their own. None of those things gives either party the right to "claim" them. I'm sick of it.


34 posted on 06/11/2005 9:53:06 AM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trueblackman; EternalVigilance

Your thoughts on this?

I would love to see Michael Zak speak at a West Virginia GOP function... in particular, in re their upcoming US Senate race against you know who. :)


36 posted on 06/15/2005 5:26:56 PM PDT by Illya Kuryakin ("The people are uninformed and can be easily misled by a few designing men." - Elbridge Gerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Isn't the Senate apologizing for not passing anti-lynching legislation in the 50's/60's without (1) mentioning filibusters and (2) mentioning who blocked said legislation.


37 posted on 06/15/2005 5:32:06 PM PDT by AmishDude (Join the AmishDude fan club: "Bravo" -- EODTIM69; "Very good!" -- pepperdog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
"Mastery over blacks has always been Democratic policy," the Calvert Recorder quoted Zak as saying during the dinner speech. In the book, Zak calls the Ku Klux Klan the "terrorist wing" of the Democratic Party.

Pretty much historical fact, IMHO. For 100 years, the Democrats maintained power via the "solid South" and Urban Ethnic bases using race bating and class hatred. Mix in the intimidation tactics of their KLAN and Union sub-chapters and it was easy to suppress "dissidents" in each base.

For the last 50 years, they have maintained power via the solid "minority" vote based on race and class hatred and the intimidation tactics of their so-called "Civil Rights" sub-chapters that attack on command any "dissidents" such as the Honorable Lt. Governor of the State of Maryland.

It's been a remarkably consistent party for over 150 years. Their continuing theme is to cast fear, doubt, division and hatred all designed to pit one group of Americans against another with their objective always to have the largest segment on their side. It worked pretty well as long as professional cynics ran the party, but fell on hard times since the true zealot 60 radicals took over. The problem the Democrat have now, is that the leadership actually believes in the crap they are trying to sell when only truly corrupt cynics like Boss Tweed, Bill Daley, or Bill Clinton can really peddle that load of manure.

38 posted on 06/15/2005 5:52:11 PM PDT by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson