Drugs R Bad... mmmkayy???
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 06/11/2005 12:08:33 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Duplicate: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1420584/posts |
Posted on 06/10/2005 2:29:28 PM PDT by Nachum
Considering that alcohol has non-intoxicating uses, its legaility really has nothing to do with the question of allowing marijuana to be used for medical purposes.
I agree that this was a lousy decision. Pot should be legalized across the board. Alcohol is much, much more destructive to some peoples' lives than pot is (or could be, in my opinion). Keeping marijuana illegal is asinine.
Drugs R Bad... mmmkayy???
I have no problem with marijuana being prescribed as a drug for cancer etc. There are many drugs that cause horrible things to happen to people when not used in a regulated way. That's why you can only get them with a prescription. I don't get why marijuana can't be treated the same way. Perhaps someone can explain this to me.
There are people who give exactly that reason... have been, for a long time, far longer than the medical angle has been around. To not support legalization just because of the medical-pot movement strikes me as a bit... phony. Either it's the right thing to do or it's not, what other people say about it shouldn't make a difference.
Oh I see, we should wait for the FDA to do a 5 year study and for permission to be given to the drug companies to test it so it can be properly regulated and taxed. Then, after it is found effective, it can be sold to the public for $100 a pill.
In the mean time, chemo sufferers who might have benefitted and could have had the drug cheaply can go to hell?
No offense, but most of the people I know like you are the first ones to hunt for some pot when their loved ones are puking their brains out after they start doing chemo.
Are you saying that they've created an accurate tool to measure feelings?
The reason they can't perscribe marijuana is because it varries so much from one batch to another. There is no quality control. Some batches may be normal and some my be super strong depending on how & where it is grown. I have friends whose offspring (and some not so young -- some of them now 50 years old) have made total messes of their lives over use of this drug. When you get close enough to inquire what happened to this formerly handsome, bright, educated young man (who is now schlepping around living off his folks) invariably it goes back to pot use.
Zofran is held under the tongue until it disolves. I can't see that as being any worse than drawing hot gas into your lungs.
You may have answered your own question. Just as chemical companies like DuPont didn't want to compete against natural hemp, drug companies like Purdue Pharma (manufacturer of OxyContin) probably don't want to compete against natural marijuana.
She only said that the other drugs did not work and that MJ did.
The war on pot was initially justified by raising the fear that white girls would be seduced by black musicians using pot. The arguements have changed a bit since then, but not much.
OK -- using pot has potential bad consequences for some people.
That is an arguement for not USING pot, and arguement that should be presented to every young person.
That is NOT an arguement for CRIMINALIZATING pot.
Many of us hold two beliefs at the same time without contradiction:
1) Using Drugs, including Pot, is bad.
2) The War on Drugs is worse.
I am past 60, and I still haven't heard a good approach for discouraging vices (e.g., use of pot, tobacco, alcohol, prostitution, promiscuous gay sex, etc.) which do not create worse consequences than the vices being discouraged.
The war on pot has killed more people and destroyed more lives (e.g., due to mandatory minimum sentences for simple drug possession) than the pot would have if left alone and discouraged with education. It has resulted in the formation of a police state, and the loss of rights, the loss of restraints placed on the government by the Constitution. It has resulted in the waste of billions of dollars extracted from taxpayers at the point of a gun. It has resulted in the corruption of the justice system, from cops to prosecuters to judges to legislators.
It is time to look at ways of reducing harm, not exchanging the "use of drugs" harm for another which is much worse.
Guess you'd better go tell them. Pssst ~ don't take your gun.
Where ever did you get the idea chemical companies led the battle to ban MJ?
In a nutshell, why FR is chock full of Lepers.
States should be able to regulate all drug use.
The only time the feds should stick their heads in is when there are inter-state trensactions involved.
If I wasn't so much sharper and smarter than you I would get mad at that.
Guess I'm just in a bad mood.
:>)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.