Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sikorsky to Build New, Faster Helicopter
AP ^ | June 1, 2005 | Lolita C. Baldor

Posted on 06/01/2005 4:05:59 PM PDT by Righty_McRight

WASHINGTON - Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. announced plans Wednesday to build a high-tech helicopter that, propelled by a new rotor system, would be much faster than conventional models.

The helicopter, which will also use technologies developed for the military's now-cancelled Comanche program, is being designed and built by Sikorsky and its New York subsidiary, Schweizer Aircraft. Sikorsky is owned by Hartford, Conn.-based United Technologies Corp.

In a conference call, officials from Sikorsky and Schweizer said the helicopter would be able to cruise at more than 250 knots, about 100 knots faster than helicopters in service today. Work on the prototype would add about 30 jobs at Schweizer's Elmira, N.Y., facility, but not affect employment at Sikorsky's Stratford, Conn., plant.

"Customers are demanding greater speed, but without sacrificing any of the unique capabilities that make helicopters the ideal platform for countless civil and military missions," said Sikorsky President Stephen Finger.

The announcement comes as Sikorsky struggles to recover from two devastating decisions by the Pentagon — the cancellation of the Comanche development program and the loss of the presidential helicopter contract to rival Lockheed Martin of Maryland. The Pentagon has increased its orders for Sikorsky Army and Navy Hawk helicopters, prompting the company to add about 150 jobs.

The first testing flight for the new helicopter could take place by the end of the year, while the first full prototype to fly could be by the end of next year, the companies said.

The new rotor system, which features vertically stacked rotors spinning in opposite directions, will allow the helicopter to fly faster without hurting its ability to hover and maneuver.

Shares of United Technologies rose 79 cents, or 0.7 percent, to close at $107.49 in trading on the New York Stock Exchange.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: helicopter; sikorsky; x2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Sikorsky Aircraft announced plans Wednesday, June 1, 2005, to build a new high-tech helicopter that, propelled by a new rotor system, would be much faster than conventional models. An artist's undated rendering of the new helicopter is seen here. (AP Photo/Sikorsky Aircraft)
1 posted on 06/01/2005 4:06:00 PM PDT by Righty_McRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

Nice looking bird....


2 posted on 06/01/2005 4:07:17 PM PDT by tje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
COunter rotating rotors allows for the removla of the traditional tail prop (to offset the centrifugal force), and replace it with a pusher prop. Cool.

Sounds like it has lots of promise too me.

3 posted on 06/01/2005 4:10:11 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

And maybe there will be a new computer game too. I loved Comanche.


4 posted on 06/01/2005 4:11:28 PM PDT by TFine80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud

This is a coaxial compound helicopter.

It will be interesting to see if modern composites will allow it to be cost competative with traditional chopper lay outs.

The USMC would want a gunship version if it could keep up with a V-22.

Who knows, the V-22 may collapse and a USMC troop ship version of this bird may come to pass.


5 posted on 06/01/2005 4:13:54 PM PDT by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
But how do the rotors overcome ultrasonic problem?

Seems more to me like it's going to need push instead of rotor tilt, and be an airplane to some degree in fast flight.

6 posted on 06/01/2005 4:18:53 PM PDT by blackdog (How are the ones and zeroes treating you today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I wonder how its speed and payload lift capability is compared to the V-22 Osprey? Osprey is a lot complicated because it uses a pair of tilt rotors which lifts like a helicopter, but the engines rotate on the wing and eventually flies like a prop plane. Advantage is its horizotal speed. I wonder if this new helicopter design is alot simplier mechanically and computer software wise?


7 posted on 06/01/2005 4:20:09 PM PDT by Fee (Great powers never let minor allies dictate who, where and when they must fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing
Who knows, the V-22 may collapse and a USMC troop ship version of this bird may come to pass.

I think some type of improved helicopter is bound to replace the V-22. It is just too complex and expensive.

So9

8 posted on 06/01/2005 4:20:11 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
Goo news indeed . . .
9 posted on 06/01/2005 4:22:07 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Righty_McRight

Sikorsky already built a helicopter like this in the 60's or 70'. It was called the ABC for Advancing Blade Concept. At high airspeeds the retreating blade loses lift with a single rotor. Twin counter rotating rotors eliminates this problem.

I saw the ABC fly at several airshows when I was a kid. Way cool memories. I'll see if I can find some pics.


11 posted on 06/01/2005 4:30:03 PM PDT by Jack of all Trades
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

subsidiary, Schweizer Aircraft....didn't Schweizer build the Ag-Cat crop duster..................?


12 posted on 06/01/2005 4:31:48 PM PDT by spokeshave (Strategery + Schardenfreude = Stratenschardenfreudery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
Here's a pic.


13 posted on 06/01/2005 4:36:37 PM PDT by Jack of all Trades
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight; All
Lockheed AH-56A Cheyenne 1967


14 posted on 06/01/2005 4:49:09 PM PDT by Conservative Firster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight; Aeronaut

This is one chopper that will never get off the ground- it isn't ugly enough to be repelled by the earth.


15 posted on 06/01/2005 4:58:04 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (End dependence on foreign oil- put a Slowpoke in your basement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
If they can turn that into a real helicopter, there would a surprisingly huge market for such a machine. Why? Because it would be perfect for use as an executive business transport to travel to outlying areas, and with careful rotor design it may be quiet enough to operate out of many airports with less noise abatement restrictions (maybe it'll even meet the British Quota Count 2 standard, the toughest aviation noise standard in the world).
16 posted on 06/01/2005 5:08:46 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

Faster??? Why not buy the Osprey or do they also believe that turkey will never fly.


17 posted on 06/01/2005 5:13:01 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

I hope the Pentagon will reconsider its plan to take Marine One away from Sikorsky and give it to a consortium of foreign manufacturers.


18 posted on 06/01/2005 5:15:43 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888; Tijeras_Slim; FireTrack; Pukin Dog; citabria; B Knotts; kilowhskey; cyphergirl; ...

19 posted on 06/01/2005 6:00:35 PM PDT by Aeronaut (2 Chronicles 7:14.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

Actually, it looks like one of several Kamov designs. Igor, call your lawyer!


20 posted on 06/01/2005 6:04:09 PM PDT by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson