Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEC fines Jackson, DNC for campaign finance violations in 2000 election
AP Wires | 5-26-2005 | AP Wire

Posted on 05/26/2005 8:54:57 AM PDT by Thanatos

FEC fines Jackson, DNC for campaign finance violations in 2000 election

By SHARON THEIMER Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Democratic Party, the Rev. Jesse Jackson and two groups associated with the civil rights activist have agreed to pay a total of $200,000 in civil fines for campaign finance violations in the 2000 elections.

At issue in the Federal Election Commission case was about $450,000 in election spending by Jackson, the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition and the Citizenship Education Fund using funds from the groups. The two non-profit groups were incorporated, making their money corporate and subject to restrictions under federal campaign finance laws.

According to the FEC, the money was used for a partisan get-out-the-vote effort and voter registration speaking tour that was coordinated with the Democratic National Committee and included appearances by Jackson and Democratic House and Senate candidates.

Federal campaign finance law bans the use of corporate money for partisan, candidate-specific federal election activities.

Under an agreement with the FEC, Jackson and the two groups will share in a $100,000 civil penalty, and the DNC will also pay $100,000. The commission announced the outcome of the case Thursday.

The $450,000 in election spending was eventually reimbursed by the Democratic National Committee and various other Democratic entities.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: campaignfinance; fec

1 posted on 05/26/2005 8:54:57 AM PDT by Thanatos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Thanatos

O.K., let me get this straight. They get to spend millions influencing voters in a partisan way and only have to pay $100,000 each? Sounds like a repeat in 2008. What a deal.


2 posted on 05/26/2005 8:57:59 AM PDT by poobear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thanatos

I think there should be another penalty tied to this: The IRS should be ordered to revoke the tax-exempt status RETROACTIVELY and they should be forced to pay full taxes on all income.


3 posted on 05/26/2005 8:59:43 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thanatos; Liz; SierraWasp; Ernest_at_the_Beach; mhking; nutmeg; MeekOneGOP

Good news.


4 posted on 05/26/2005 9:09:30 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 5 decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

"I think there should be another penalty tied to this: The IRS should be ordered to revoke the tax-exempt status RETROACTIVELY and they should be forced to pay full taxes on all income."

You are right on target. For years I have said, posted and noted that it should be a criminal offense for any non profit to donate $, launder $'s or to participate in any election.

The first penalty would be loss of their tax exempt status. Then. the execs and board members would face criminal and civil charges. Jail sentences and loss of their homes and other personal assets would stop the bs very quickly.


5 posted on 05/26/2005 9:12:19 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 5 decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

(Thanks for the heads up, Grampa Dave!)

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

6 posted on 05/26/2005 9:15:13 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thanatos

Corporate money for elections...big no-no!!!


7 posted on 05/26/2005 9:16:21 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan (June 14 - Defeat DeWine - Vote Tom Brinkman for Congress (OH-2) - http://www.gobrinkman.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thanatos

Jesse Jackson is thinking, "Chump change."


8 posted on 05/26/2005 9:25:51 AM PDT by TheGrimReaper ("Virtue begat Prosperity, and the daughter killed the mother". - Cotton Mather, 1720.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poobear
"They get to spend millions influencing voters in a partisan way and only have to pay $100,000 each"

It's worst than you think. It looks to me like they split the penalty.

9 posted on 05/26/2005 9:28:59 AM PDT by libs_kma (USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libs_kma

Exactly. The fine is $200,000 and their splitting it. What a deal. If it were the right doing this, there would be jail time! How much of this crap are they going to get away with? I guess the answer is "as much as they CAN".

Just D@mn!


10 posted on 05/26/2005 9:49:49 AM PDT by poobear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Abram; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; blackeagle; BroncosFan; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
11 posted on 05/26/2005 9:55:08 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (If you want to change government support the libertarian party www.lp.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thanatos

BTTT


12 posted on 05/26/2005 11:02:27 AM PDT by Asphalt (Join the NFL ping list ... All thing football ... FReepmail Asphalt to get on or off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Fixed it.
13 posted on 05/26/2005 12:11:12 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (Je$$e Jack-a$$ is NOT a "civil rights" activist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

racial agitator and extortionist

**
You nailed it.


14 posted on 05/26/2005 5:15:16 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

When I hear their tax exempt status has FINALLY been revoked, than I will cheer. $200,000 is chump change to the likes to these fat cats.


15 posted on 05/26/2005 5:17:57 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson