Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Text of Filibuster Deal
Received via e-mail | Monday, May 23, 2005 | Rats and Rinos

Posted on 05/23/2005 5:23:07 PM PDT by kristinn

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS

 

We respect the diligent, conscientious efforts, to date, rendered to the Senate by Majority Leader Frist and Democratic Leader Reid. This memorandum confirms an understanding among the signatories, based upon mutual trust and confidence, related to pending and future judicial nominations in the 109th Congress.

 

This memorandum is in two parts. Part I relates to the currently pending judicial nominees; Part II relates to subsequent individual nominations to be made by the President and to be acted upon by the Senate’s Judiciary Committee.

 

We have agreed to the following:

 

Part I:  Commitments on Pending Judicial Nominations

 

A.        Votes for Certain Nominees. We will vote to invoke cloture on the following judicial nominees: Janice Rogers Brown (D.C. Circuit), William Pryor (11th Circuit), and Priscilla Owen (5th Circuit).

 

B.        Status of Other Nominees. Signatories make no commitment to vote for or against cloture on the following judicial nominees: William Myers (9th Circuit) and Henry Saad (6th Circuit).

 

Part II:  Commitments for Future Nominations

 

A.        Future Nominations. Signatories will exercise their responsibilities under the Advice and Consent Clause of the United States Constitution in good faith. Nominees should only be filibustered under extraordinary circumstances, and each signatory must use his or her own discretion and judgment in determining whether such circumstances exist.

 

B.        Rules Changes. In light of the spirit and continuing commitments made in this agreement, we commit to oppose the rules changes in the 109th Congress, which we understand to be any amendment to or interpretation of the Rules of the Senate that would force a vote on a judicial nomination by means other than unanimous consent or Rule XXII.

 

We believe that, under Article II, Section 2, of the United States Constitution, the word “Advice” speaks to consultation between the Senate and the President with regard to the use of the President’s power to make nominations. We encourage the Executive branch of government to consult with members of the Senate, both Democratic and Republican, prior to submitting a judicial nomination to the Senate for consideration.

 

Such a return to the early practices of our government may well serve to reduce the rancor that unfortunately accompanies the advice and consent process in the Senate.

 

We firmly believe this agreement is consistent with the traditions of the United States Senate that we as Senators seek to uphold.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; filibuster; judicialnominees; transcript; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-400 next last
Read it and weep.
1 posted on 05/23/2005 5:23:07 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Words written by US Senators.

What is it worth?

2 posted on 05/23/2005 5:24:23 PM PDT by lormand (George W. Bush is saving your ass, whether you like it or not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

There WILL be ABSOLUTE HELL FOR THESE SENATORS TO PAY FOR THIS!!!!


3 posted on 05/23/2005 5:25:12 PM PDT by GeoPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Frist folds.

No way he gets my vote, for anything, ever.

4 posted on 05/23/2005 5:27:08 PM PDT by Darkwolf (aka Darkwolf377 lurker since'01, member since 4/'04--stop clogging me with pings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
B. Rules Changes. In light of the spirit and continuing commitments made in this agreement, we commit to oppose the rules changes in the 109th Congress, which we understand to be any amendment to or interpretation of the Rules of the Senate that would force a vote on a judicial nomination by means other than unanimous consent or Rule XXII.

This is the part I'm concerned about. How long does the 109th Congress last?

5 posted on 05/23/2005 5:28:23 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
We will vote to invoke cloture on the following judicial nominees: Janice Rogers Brown (D.C. Circuit), William Pryor (11th Circuit), and Priscilla Owen (5th Circuit).

What I find interesting is the Dems let through the ones sure to generate the most political heat on them (the women and Pryor).

6 posted on 05/23/2005 5:28:29 PM PDT by JAWs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

We've been had by gutless punks.

I'm embarassed to be from Ohio in light of the activities of the idiot Senators DeWhine and Voinovich.


7 posted on 05/23/2005 5:29:00 PM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Life is too short to go through it clenched of sphincter and void of humor - it's okay to laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
How long does the 109th Congress last?

Until the next elections. 2006.

8 posted on 05/23/2005 5:29:26 PM PDT by JAWs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lormand; kristinn
Words written by US Senators. What is it worth?

The problem I see is that "extraordinary circumstances" are left to the lefties discretion, and no matter who they block, their compliance with the agreement is not measurable, while that of the Republicans is. Might be OK the other way around, since the Pubbies seem to be so concerned with acting like gentlemen, but this way it's a recipe for disaster, IMHO.

9 posted on 05/23/2005 5:29:39 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
TILL THE NEXT ELECTION 2006. Basically the Dems can filibuster if thy feel it is extraordinary circumstances but we forfeit the bird option till elections of 2006.
10 posted on 05/23/2005 5:30:00 PM PDT by GeoPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

January 3, 2007, IIRC.


11 posted on 05/23/2005 5:30:19 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf

Looks like Linsey Graham was very helpfull to McCain in stabbing the rest of the republicans in the back.


12 posted on 05/23/2005 5:30:49 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud (REMEMBER - If you send it, they'll spend it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

They can shove it. I won't contribute any more money to the RNC and I won't be voting in 2006. The repsters suck. It is difficult to believe that this is what they have done with the power we have given them.


13 posted on 05/23/2005 5:31:09 PM PDT by putupjob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

Each "Congress" is the two year term of reps, so the 110th will begin when they're seated following the November 2006 elections.


14 posted on 05/23/2005 5:31:17 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf
It doesn't appear that Frist folded, but rather he had the rug pulled from under him.
15 posted on 05/23/2005 5:32:02 PM PDT by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Excuse me guy and girls, but this is a deal worked out by a group of Senators and not the leadership, so before you jump on Frist you need to read what is going on. The Majority Leader does not have to accept this.


16 posted on 05/23/2005 5:32:27 PM PDT by Trueblackman (Terrorism and Liberalism never sleep and neither do I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JAWs

The way Reid was gushing on the floor a few minutes ago, he thinks he got the best of the deal.


17 posted on 05/23/2005 5:32:40 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
The Democrats caved. They knew they would have lost a constitutional option vote and so they needed a way to save face. They could resume the filibuster in the future but for all practical matters, their threat's an empty one. Three of President Bush's nominees get voted on they'll be confirmed. Chalk it up any way you like, bottom line, if the Democrats thought they had the votes to defeat the constitutional option, there would have been NO deal. It doesn't make me happy but in life you can't get everything you want. The fact seven Democrats didn't agree with Dingy Harry is virtually as illuminating as the fact McCain wouldn't have voted with us. Its over for the obstructionist, do nothing party.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
18 posted on 05/23/2005 5:32:55 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf

Frist was never going to get my vote. If there was any minute doubt, it has been removed for ever and for good.

Guy has the backbone of a snail and zero charisma (certainly on on TV).


19 posted on 05/23/2005 5:33:14 PM PDT by beckaz (The facts of life are conservative. (Maggie Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf
Frist folds.

Frist had nothing to do with this betrayal. It is by 7 traitor RINOs who deserve an early retirement.

20 posted on 05/23/2005 5:33:17 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-400 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson