Skip to comments.
Media Want More Photos of Dead GIs
NewsMax ^
| May 23, 2005
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 05/23/2005 10:21:27 AM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: Mr. Silverback
This is only true if you're a photography editor propagandist who wants to affect the war. The rest of us know what 1,500 dead soldiers means, and you can bet the Iraqis know what it means: It means they get to do the purple finger thing instead of the finger-beaten-off-with-an-iron-rod-thing.Exactly, but the leftwing MSM will never understand
41
posted on
05/23/2005 11:32:46 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: kjenerette
42
posted on
05/23/2005 11:34:17 AM PDT
by
Van Jenerette
(Our Republic...if we can keep it!)
To: Van Jenerette
Why don't they show a picture of the cemetary at Arlington and Normandy then? They piss on every one of those graves every time they publish an American-hating troop bashing diatribe.
43
posted on
05/23/2005 11:35:59 AM PDT
by
boofus
To: ariamne
Bloody hypocrites. Well said Shieldmaiden of the Infidel!
The MSM is the enemy from within... doing everything in their power to defeat our troops, hurt our President and destroy this great Country!
44
posted on
05/23/2005 11:38:29 AM PDT
by
jan in Colorado
(The Time Is Now!...Be informed, Be ready, Be diligent, Be armed!)
To: Kaslin
To: weegee
Stand by for "fake but accurate" POSED pictures from the MSM.
I gather that Journalism Schools have made "Reporting Just the Facts" a seldom-offered elective course...
46
posted on
05/23/2005 11:44:40 AM PDT
by
pfony1
To: weegee
Stand by for "fake but accurate" POSED pictures from the MSM.
I gather that Journalism Schools have made "Reporting Just the Facts" a seldom-offered elective course...
47
posted on
05/23/2005 11:45:03 AM PDT
by
pfony1
To: Kaslin
48
posted on
05/23/2005 11:48:13 AM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: rlmorel
49
posted on
05/23/2005 11:49:16 AM PDT
by
Dick Vomer
(liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
To: Dick Vomer
photos of religion of peace for Newsweek
50
posted on
05/23/2005 11:49:52 AM PDT
by
Dick Vomer
(liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
To: Peach
Yup, virtually all of the LSM morons embraced the view that showing photos and video footage would be 'inflammatory' (i.e., might further motivate REAL Americans to fight Islamo-fascist terrorists) and so our LSM had been almost devoid of any visual depictions of the thousands of victims of 9/11 since the day itself.
So let's see, showing the public the actual carnage of 9/11 terrorists is too 'inflammatory' yet it is vital, essential, mandatory that the LSM show every possible dead US soldier, Marine, etc.
Yeah, I don't detect any depraved left-wing agenda here....
51
posted on
05/23/2005 11:50:30 AM PDT
by
Enchante
(Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
To: Dick Vomer
Yeah I think I understand the war on terrorism just find. I think the press has shown what the religion of peace is all about.....
52
posted on
05/23/2005 11:53:19 AM PDT
by
Dick Vomer
(liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
To: tumblindice
lol How funny would it be to hear it played in the Senate shortly after the so call nuclear option passing.
53
posted on
05/23/2005 11:54:34 AM PDT
by
TheForceOfOne
(My tagline is currently being blocked by Congressional filibuster for being to harsh.)
To: Kaslin
We definitely need more dead journalists, after all, they're becoming useless anyway with all the bloggers and truthful eye witness accounts of things going on....
bury them... no big loss...
54
posted on
05/23/2005 11:54:57 AM PDT
by
schwing_wifey
(Coffee, Today's Toons, and Flaming Trolls - Yeeeaaaahhhhhhh PDT +9hours)
To: Kaslin
Michele McNally, New York Times director of photography, concurred, observing: "War kills men, women and children, and we would be remiss if we couldn't in some way show that this is what happens in war . . . It's our responsibility to bear witness to these events."So Michelle how many photos of people falling from the WTC did the New York Times publish?
55
posted on
05/23/2005 11:54:59 AM PDT
by
aculeus
(Ceci n'est pas une tag line.)
To: 68 grunt
About time for a little "necktie" party at the big oak at the end of town. Lets start with the Newsweak editorial staff.
56
posted on
05/23/2005 12:11:16 PM PDT
by
RightWingConspirator
(Glad that Ted the Boorish Drunk, Hitlery the Witch and John Fonda/Fraud Kerry are not my senators.)
To: RightWingConspirator
I'm ready for some 'adult assembly'.
57
posted on
05/23/2005 12:18:04 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
To: 68 grunt
To: 68 grunt
To: Kaslin
Chris Hondros told the Times, "I think if we are going to start a war, we ought to be willing to show the consequences of that war." Here are some of the consequences of that war, the ones that the noble American servicemen and women risk their lives to accomplish:
60
posted on
05/23/2005 12:34:41 PM PDT
by
TChris
(Just once, we need an elected official to stand up to a clearly incorrect ruling by a court. - Ann C)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
