Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Good Press for the U.N. - ("The Interpreter" blatant promo for Kofi and U.N.!)
A.I.M.ORG ^ | MAY 19, 2005 | CLIFF KINCAID

Posted on 05/19/2005 12:46:10 PM PDT by CHARLITE

The reviews of the film The Interpreter have been extremely positive. "Two thumbs up," say Ebert & Roeper. Larry King calls it "spellbinding." Rolling Stone calls it "smart." We agree with that last characterization. As we noted in a column, the film is political propaganda designed to boost the image of the United Nations and make the U.S. look bad for opposing the International Criminal Court. It is one of the smartest pieces of political propaganda to come out of Hollywood.

Meryl Gordon's article about U.N. boss Kofi Annan, in the May 2 edition of New York magazine, notes that Annan "received a warm welcome" at the VIP screening of the film in New York. But the article is more informative in what it says about Annan's effort to rehabilitate his own image.

During his first term as U.N. Secretary-General, Gordon says that Annan was "the toast of Washington and New York," associating with such people as Oscar de La Renta and Tom Brokaw. That's the same Tom Brokaw who was anchor of the NBC Nightly News. He's the same Tom Brokaw who provided an endorsement of Linda Fasulo's pro-U.N. book, An Insider's Guide to the U.N. Fasulo covers the U.N. for NBC News, MSNBC, and National Public Radio. This book, as AIM disclosed, was funded by the pro-U.N. lobby to the tune of $26,000.

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: backing; kofiannan; liberalmedia; movie; partisan; praise; promotion; proun; stupidmovie; theinterpreter; tombrokaw; uncorruption

1 posted on 05/19/2005 12:46:12 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Much Ado over nothing. This film was terrible.


2 posted on 05/19/2005 12:47:26 PM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jalapeno

And unprofitable.


3 posted on 05/19/2005 12:49:01 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jalapeno
the Nazis produced more believable propaganda films!!
4 posted on 05/19/2005 12:54:46 PM PDT by aspiring.hillbilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

It's already been reported that like Bush the UN is paying reporters for good press, but when Bush does it it's just plain WRONG!~}


5 posted on 05/19/2005 1:13:24 PM PDT by funkywbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jalapeno

Rules of Thumb:

1) If Hollywood insiders like it, it sucks.
2) If it's a sequel without the full original cast, it sucks.
3) If it gets one of the top four academy awards, it sucks.
4) If it has anything to do with Michael Moore, it sucks.
5) If it purports to be a "serious" film, it sucks.


6 posted on 05/19/2005 1:28:15 PM PDT by henkster (When democrats talk of "the rich," they are referring to anyone with a private sector job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Too late, this movie has already disappeared from theaters. It may have been pro-UN propaganda, but at least no one saw it!


7 posted on 05/19/2005 1:38:33 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson