To: Pikamax
But the magazine, while acknowledging unspecified errors in the article, stopped short of retracting it.Kinda like acknowledging forgeries but insisting they are true, huh?
4 posted on
05/15/2005 7:25:31 PM PDT by
Paul Atreides
(FACT: More atrocities have been perpetrated with a hot glue gun, than with a hand gun)
To: Paul Atreides
Kinda like acknowledging forgeries but insisting they are true, huh? They wanted it to be true, at any rate.
The magazine said that because of reports of other abuses of prisoners by guards at Guantánamo, the possibility that a Koran was flushed down the toilet did not seem that far-fetched.
Weasels!
The MSM is the propaganda arm of our enemies.
9 posted on
05/15/2005 7:33:55 PM PDT by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: Paul Atreides
You know, I saw the title of this thread, then saw it was a NYT article, and wondered to myself how long it would take for the 'but' to appear. I made it through one whole sentence.
Unbelievable, just f@#@ing unbelievable.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson