Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim law cleric doubts sharia suitable for Canadian society
Globe and Mail ^ | 05/14/05 | ESTANISLAO OZIEWICZ

Posted on 05/14/2005 4:18:58 PM PDT by Pikamax

The grand mufti of Marseilles is adding his voice to those opposed to applying religious laws in family matters, a practice Ontario is proposing to extend to Muslims in the province.

Soheib Bencheikh, an Algerian Muslim cleric who is also the highest official of religious law for Marseilles, said yesterday that sharia, or traditional Islamic law, incorporates both spiritual and judicial concepts developed exclusively by men centuries ago and that are subject to interpretation.

He said they may not apply to contemporary Canadian society.

"Is it possible to apply the sharia in societies that are governed by constitutions that stand for gender equality?" asked Mr. Bencheikh, who supports France's prohibition of religious symbols in schools.

Advertisements

"It's illogical to apply today the precepts conceived [in tribal, patriarchal societies] to safeguard the interests of yesterday."

Ontario's proposal to create an Islamic arbitration system -- similar to those that exist for Jews and Ismailis -- to settle family and inheritance disputes has been attacked by some Canadian Muslim women's groups, which argue that women would be coerced and lose rights afforded them under Canadian law.

Mr. Bencheikh was speaking by telephone from Montreal, where he was attending a conference organized by Rights & Democracy, an organization created by Parliament in 1988 to promote human rights and democracy around the world. The conference is exploring religious fundamentalism and its growing threat to human rights.

Rights & Democracy has denounced Ontario's move to faith-based arbitration of family matters. President Jean-Louis Roy recently wrote to Attorney-General Michael Bryant, saying that such arbitration has the effect of privatizing family law by creating a parallel system that allows the religious, cultural and political elites that organize the dispute-settlement procedures to decide on the applicable law.

With the support of the Canadian Council of Muslim Women and the National Association of Women and the Law, Mr. Roy argues that many religions can be interpreted as incorporating a gender bias to the disadvantage of women's equality rights.

"[This] could very realistically result in discrimination against women," he said.

Ziba Mir-Hosseini, of the international coalition Women Living under Muslim Law, said there are two current trends in interpreting Islamic family law: one is authoritarian, retrograde, patriarchal and detrimental to women's rights, and the other is progressive and acknowledges women's rights.

She says that if Ontario were to approve the application of Islamic law through arbitration panels, it could be seen outside Canada as favouring the authoritarian trend.

Mr. Bencheikh said that applying sharia in provincial arbitration panels also runs the risk of putting Islam in a bad light and creating divisions among people rather than bringing them together.

Rights & Democracy says that while it recognizes the right to religious freedom includes the right to participate in religious processes to resolve family disputes, Canada must not allow this to override its obligation to eliminate violence and discrimination against women.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; sharia

1 posted on 05/14/2005 4:18:59 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Duh?


2 posted on 05/14/2005 4:21:44 PM PDT by Crazieman (If Con is the opposite of Pro, what is the opposite of Progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"It's illogical to apply today the precepts conceived [in tribal, patriarchal societies] to safeguard the interests of yesterday."

Ya think?

3 posted on 05/14/2005 4:24:01 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Newly Discovered breed of Cephalopod - Billius Fristus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
even the muslims understand this.
4 posted on 05/14/2005 4:24:23 PM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CzarNicky

Sadly not enough of them though.


5 posted on 05/14/2005 4:28:04 PM PDT by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kalee

I think they all understand it. Just some or most of them see it as a means of supplanting western law for their own.


6 posted on 05/14/2005 4:33:28 PM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
He said they may not apply to contemporary Canadian society.

But what about the future Canadian society?

7 posted on 05/14/2005 4:44:03 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"Canada must not allow this to override its obligation to eliminate violence and discrimination against women."

Not only against women, but against any other human being, Muslim or not, female or not, child or not, who strays from the path of the prophet -- and even from Islam itself.

The right to self-determination is a human and unalienable right, as is the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

And the state (under the rule of law) determines who is supposed to be executed. Ritual murder, beheadings, maiming, or any other atrocity inflicted upon any human being is the mark of a death cult. Get rid of your macho BS and superiority and you might just qualify to join the family of civilized nations.

And turn the volume on the speakers wayyyy down.

Yo, grand mufti. Live Long and Prosper, and watch your backside very closely.

8 posted on 05/14/2005 4:51:13 PM PDT by Eastbound (Jacked out since 3/31/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Of course they must first get rid of the Canadians..
simply breed them out...and buy them out...


9 posted on 05/14/2005 7:13:09 PM PDT by joesnuffy (The generation that survived the depression and won WW2 proved poverty does not cause crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

No Shi'ite.


10 posted on 05/14/2005 7:14:39 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"Hey, like we're more than a little concerned about that hosehead sharia law thing and its prohibitions against the ingestion of fine Canadian adult malt beverages, eh."


11 posted on 05/14/2005 7:19:27 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson