This is a long read but if you're a space nerd it's very interesting. I decided not to post the entire article so you'll have to check the link if you want to read the whole thing.
1 posted on
05/11/2005 6:33:23 AM PDT by
Arkie2
To: KevinDavis
2 posted on
05/11/2005 6:33:57 AM PDT by
Arkie2
(No, I never voted for Bill Clinton.)
3 posted on
05/11/2005 6:34:59 AM PDT by
ELS
(Vivat Benedictus XVI!)
To: Arkie2
whatever happenned to the new planet, selena, or something like that?
4 posted on
05/11/2005 6:36:35 AM PDT by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
To: Arkie2
Gaseous anomolies in the neutral zone?........
5 posted on
05/11/2005 6:44:32 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Remember, Jimmy Carter can still run for another term as President..........)
To: Arkie2
interesting read... thanks!
6 posted on
05/11/2005 6:44:42 AM PDT by
mwyounce
To: Arkie2
7 posted on
05/11/2005 6:46:23 AM PDT by
Nowhere Man
(Lutheran, Conservative, Neo-Victorian/Edwardian, Michael Savage in '08! - Any Questions?)
To: Arkie2
I remember when the shuttle disintegrated and the techies kept saying the guages went "off scale low".
Now they say "unexplained acceleration backward".
So is it too far away or too close?
8 posted on
05/11/2005 6:52:05 AM PDT by
djf
To: Arkie2
OK, I missed something. Or is this just the way scientics speak?
If an object, travling out of the solar system displays "an anomalous acceleration toward the Sun" does it really mean it's unexpectedly SLOWING?
Also, would not the unexplained motions in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune coupled with this slowing provide three points of reference?
If a single phenomona could explain all three that might just be considered a clue...
9 posted on
05/11/2005 6:56:42 AM PDT by
kAcknor
(That's my version of it anyway....)
To: Arkie2
11 posted on
05/11/2005 7:12:10 AM PDT by
laishly
To: Arkie2
its them lousy reptilians AGAIN!!
To: Arkie2
I'm not surprised there's an anomaly, considering nobody's figured gravity out yet.
To: Arkie2
Interesting article. I particularly enjoyed the exposition of the way the astrophysicists are handling the data (ie. asking the questions as to whether either this anomaly violates any OTHER accepted pardigms or can be explained by them) rather than invoking some really far-out explanation that violates every presently known paradigm in many far-flung fields of inquiry.
Very instructive as to how scientists work.
See The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Kuhn.
17 posted on
05/11/2005 7:36:09 AM PDT by
DoctorMichael
(The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: Arkie2
We live inside a large refelective sphere. Everything you see is a reflection and it is impossible to get out of the sphere. [sillyness off]
18 posted on
05/11/2005 7:53:59 AM PDT by
CPOSharky
(You are born cold, wet, and hungry. Things get worse, then you die.)
To: Arkie2
22 posted on
05/11/2005 6:18:07 PM PDT by
clyde asbury
(Everything's gonna be all right because you're the lucky one.)
To: Arkie2
Instead of a planet causing the unknown gravitational anomaly on our solar system, could it be the gravitational pull of the black hole in the Milky Way?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson