Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Clinton Foes Seek Probe of Fundraiser (David Rosen CYA Alert!)
1010 WINS, NYC ^ | May 9, 2005 | 1010 WINS

Posted on 05/09/2005 3:27:12 PM PDT by LurkedLongEnough

(1010 WINS) (WASHINGTON) A conservative watchdog group with a history of dogging the Clintons urged a Senate panel on Monday to investigate Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton over a Hollywood fundraiser for which a former staffer faces charges.

The fundraiser is the focus of a federal trial set to begin Tuesday in Los Angeles. Prosecutors charge that former finance director David Rosen understated the cost of the star-studded August 2000 gala, which raised money for Clinton's senatorial campaign. Rosen denies the charges.

Under the campaign finance laws then in effect, underreporting the cost of the event would have given the Clinton campaign more money to spend on the race. The senator has not been charged in the case.

Judicial Watch, which has pushed officials to look into the fundraiser, filed paperwork with the Senate Ethics Committee on Monday saying she had to have known of the alleged misreporting.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton argued that Clinton closely monitored the Hollywood fundraiser and knew its actual cost was much greater than the $400,000 tab reported in campaign financial filings.

``They're false and she knows them to be false,'' Fitton said. He equated her situation with the ethics controversy surrounding House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, who has been criticized for privately funded travel.

Clinton adviser Howard Wolfson called Judicial Watch's complaint ``a meritless publicity stunt by a thoroughly discredited right-wing attack group.''

Robert Walker, a senior staffer on the ethics panel, declined to comment.

Questions about the fundraiser surfaced after Peter F. Paul, a three-time convicted felon who pleaded guilty in March to securities fraud charges, told the FBI he gave hundreds of thousands of dollars that Clinton's campaign didn't report. He told prosecutors he spent $1.1 million, but Rosen reported the amount as $400,000.

Judicial Watch took the unusual step of providing legal defense work in his criminal case, but Paul later broke with the group, complaining they were using him to raise money from conservatives opposed to the Clintons.

Fitton said the group had a ``good working relationship'' with Paul and provided him valuable legal work, but denied the group had used him in any way.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: New York
KEYWORDS: davidrosen; hillaryscandals; judicialwatch; judicialwatchisajoke; probe
ROOM-SPINNING BARF !
1 posted on 05/09/2005 3:27:12 PM PDT by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough

hardly meritless, Hillary lied in a filing to the FEC, tsk tsk.......not just a little white lie, but a WHOPPER!!!!

just think if it had been an RNC polly on the chopping block, the LLL media would be having a field day

they'd be calling it Hollywoodgate already......

now if Hillary were a Canadian Liberal they'd just yawn but....


2 posted on 05/09/2005 3:31:56 PM PDT by littlelilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough

True they dogged Clinton and they have also dogged republican administrations.


3 posted on 05/09/2005 3:32:58 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough

yeah come on Hillary is the ultimate micro manager, but being a lawyer, she's good at covering her tracks, plausible deniability, thy name is Hillary, Tony Soprano should be so careful......


4 posted on 05/09/2005 3:34:35 PM PDT by littlelilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough

There appears to be a Federal trial going on just this second with subject Senator's campaign finances as the sole reason. I would think other Senators would be doing their job and requesting the investigation first.


5 posted on 05/09/2005 3:45:25 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough

BOXER/Hilary in '08!


6 posted on 05/09/2005 3:47:18 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough

"Judicial Watch"

So I take it she will go scot free?


7 posted on 05/09/2005 4:00:53 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Probably , I have yet to read of a case Judicial watch has won.


8 posted on 05/09/2005 4:09:44 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

Great, first we have Judicial Watch; can NewSchmuck, WingNutDaily and Debka be far behind?


9 posted on 05/09/2005 4:13:45 PM PDT by Oystir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
All DNC News affiliates go to DEFCON 3, IMMEDIATELY! Prepare to initiate HRC PROTOCOL BRAVO SIERRA evasion and denial tactics. Authentication code: CUPCAKE
10 posted on 05/09/2005 4:34:46 PM PDT by MisterRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson