[Interesting Times]

Another surprisingly even-handed article on the Hillary Clinton campaign finance scandal in the NY Times...

[Interesting Times]

HillCAP ping...

[EagleUSA]

.. And they have sought to discredit him as a shady person..
----
Between the criminal Clintons and the sleazy NYT, how can HYPOCRISY become any more intense???

[doug from upland]

Can any FReeper in the L.A. area film this?

[kellynla]

I'll wait for the indictments to come down...if they ever do. LOL
The Clintoons still have copies of all those FBI files...
Nothing like having a J.Edgar Hoover insurance policy.

[Cicero]

Well, it's certainly twisted out of all recognition, and perhaps more damaging it's so filled with complicated factoids that there's a large MEGO factor (my eyes glaze over).

But normally the New York Times would not deign to notice this story at all. It's obviously damage control, which is a good sign, because it suggests that Pinch Sulzberger and the clintons have decided that this story is escaping the cone of silence and something needs to be done about it.

After all, the best damage control of all is simply to bury the story, and publication of this article indicates that that method is now beginning to fail.

I wonder who the devil Raymond Hernandez is? According to Timeswatch, he did a story on "Centering Hillary Clinton" last November 4, right after the election

[WL-law]

In the process, Mr. Rosen, 40, who faces five years in prison on each of three charges against him, could become a bit player at his own trial.

What an intentional understatement!!

Mr. Rosen will soon learn that his own lawyers are not defending him, they are defending Hillary, and Mr Rosen will just have to hang in the wind.

By all ordinary legal ethics, such attorney conflict-of-interest would be absolutely forbidden. But in the Clinton world, it's the norm, not the exception.

[WL-law]

By the way, I just checked my "LA Times" online version of the paper -- and guess what?? -- no story about the trial starting tomorrow.

Will they cover it at all? One has to wonder.

[theDentist]

Specifically, he claims that Mrs. Clinton's campaign staff did not disclose...

Another "buffer" to blame it on. "My staff didn't disclose it? I'm shocked. Shocked."

[Lucky2]

I'm surprised the beast hasn't arranged a little surpise for Rosen etc. Maybe she knows we're finally on to her (nice thought anyway...)

[doug from upland]

PETER PAUL'S SECOND APPEARANCE ON TONY SNOW RADIO SHOW

[Ursus arctos horribilis]

I notice the NY Slimes does investigative reporting on republicans, but anyone looking at demoncRATs are digging up dirt.

[RoseofTexas]

It's just a small bone to satisfy the VAST right wing! Most of the hot details will be buried somewhere in the last pages of this nasty RAT rag! Somehow the beast will come out of this smelling like a roach...uh, I mean a rose! :)

[MisterRepublican]

As if we need another example of the liberal bias of the news media. If the media had the same zeal to investigate and publicize the "ethics" of Hillary Clinton as they do Tom DeLay, Hillary wouldn't be being touted as the Democrat to beat in 2008 .

[Calpernia]

ping

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

High drama indeed. Literally, the stuff of high ratings...and yet, I haven't heard a peep about it on any of the major TV News networks. Odd that.

[Freee-dame]

a star-studded gala that charged $1,000 a person

I think that this was just for the show. Many paid $25,000 (a couple?) for dinner and a show.