Political Drama Abounds in Trial Involving Mrs. Clinton's Hollywood Fund-Raiser

New York Times ^ | May 9, 2005 | Raymond Hernandez

[RoseofTexas]

It's just a small bone to satisfy the VAST right wing! Most of the hot details will be buried somewhere in the last pages of this nasty RAT rag! Somehow the beast will come out of this smelling like a roach...uh, I mean a rose! :)

[samtheman]

Mr. Rosen will soon learn that his own lawyers are not defending him, they are defending Hillary, and Mr Rosen will just have to hang in the wind.

He's dead meat. He's deader than an out-of-favor-Foster.

[MisterRepublican]

As if we need another example of the liberal bias of the news media. If the media had the same zeal to investigate and publicize the "ethics" of Hillary Clinton as they do Tom DeLay, Hillary wouldn't be being touted as the Democrat to beat in 2008 .

[EagleUSA]

-- and guess what?? -- no story about the trial starting tomorrow.
------
Did we expect anything else from the criminal left's accomplices in the media???

[cricket]

?e?����?P?�ng to do with it. It was all those sleazy underlings she continually uses. < /sarcasm>"

Am hoping for the 'most' . . .but hard to expect too much damage here; given that Hillary lied giving her 'Grand Jury' testimony - and she was not challenged; and who has never been forced to answer the definitive on 'who hired the bar slug/bouncer Craig Livingston'. . .to take care of the nasty business of Clinton, Inc.. . .in the White House.

BTW. . .anybody know where CL is these days?

[Calpernia]

ping

[peacebaby]

This is so amusing! This is one trial that will get my very close attention.

[peacebaby]

Can you write to the LA times online and ask them why they aren't covering the trial?

[nw_arizona_granny]

bump

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

High drama indeed. Literally, the stuff of high ratings...and yet, I haven't heard a peep about it on any of the major TV News networks. Odd that.

[Velveeta]

Bookmark.
Thanks for the ping.

[blackie]

Hang 'em High!

[cricket]

[And they have sought to discredit him as a shady person.. ---- Between the criminal Clintons and the sleazy NYT, how can HYPOCRISY become any more intense???]

. . .another mouthfull along with 'colorful characters'. .

."But Mr. Paul says the Clintons and their associates turned their backs on him after The Washington Post disclosed his criminal past. . ." (thank goodness, for the Post's 'good eye'. . .)

The hypocrisy offered by MSM/NYT's, would be funny; except it is all so transparently and painfully. true.

[zot]

Thanks for the ping. I wonder why Hillary isn't a target of the lawsuit. She profited from this campaign finance fraud.

[Freee-dame]

a star-studded gala that charged $1,000 a person

I think that this was just for the show. Many paid $25,000 (a couple?) for dinner and a show.

[Just mythoughts]

"While she has not been accused of any wrongdoing and is not expected to testify, the trial represents another potentially embarrassing chapter for the Clintons, who have been criticized for their associations with other questionable figures."

Seems somebody would want the primary witness on the stand.