Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.Tell that to all the women harmed by their abortions.
I predict that in a few years she will sue the state for not looking out for her interests and preventing the abortion. Her decision to do so (I predict) will come from depression over the death of her first child and/or simple greed.
She's 13 years old, she's been in DCF care for nearly four years and she STILL gets pregnant? From what? Eating too much broccoli?
My God, my God, what a mess. This kid's life is over. And she gets to start the teenage years with a nice abortion encouraged by the state. How charming.
"....he ruled Monday that the teen would not be physically or emotionally harmed by the abortion."
sure. and the unborn baby won't be either.
So how old is the father???
Why do so many people think abortion is the answer to this girls problem? I pray this girl does not murder her baby. But since we are talking Florida here, I have a feeling the child is as good as dead.
Unbelievable. Sick. Horrid. Tragic.
Why are we punishing the innocent baby for the mess caused by others?
So the Supreme Court rules that someone who is 17 years and 364 days old isn't old enough to be held accountable for murdering someone else...
...but a thirteen-year-old is old enough to decide to have an innocent baby killed.
It's like my tagline says.
Score another success for the ACLU.
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.Good Lord, how sick. That sickening stench you smell is the decay and rot of our society.
So she was raped while in state care. Chalk up another one for the Florida DCF.
Culture of death alert.
sadness ping
Typical Liberal judge. Just because he said it does not make it true. The chances are this young woman will be scarred for life. She will remember this act, she will have feelings about it and if statistics are correct, she will stands a higher risk of cancer and future fertility and/or pregnancy problems.
The commandment, THOU SHALT NOT MURDER, stands before her, whether the states says so or not. And the fact that she is headed in that direction indicates that her spiritual state is nowhere near to God.
God is near to her, awaiting to hear the words "Lord Jesus forgive me for my sin through your death on the cross, I repent of my life and turn to you". The result may be a lovely baby and a woman becoming a mother instead of a wreck.
Our society says that motherhood is not good, God on the other hand does.
Hard to even imagine this became a court case. The judiciary brings a lot of this upon themselves by accepting cases like this. I guess if morality is not legislated it will be adjudicated.
A 13 year old is too young to be tried as an adult for a capital crime but not too young to make this decision. Go figure.
Now she'll be free to go out and continue the behavior that got her pregnant in the first place.
Why would the guardian know better than the child?
Next time my kid wants to eat dessert only, I'll just have to say, "Well, I guess a judge thinks YOU know better."
And when he grows older, and wants to stay out until 2:00 am, I'll just have to say, "The judges think you know better."
Of course, if a child can make such a huge, fundamental decision as to whether to kill another human being, they must be competent to determine their own diet, their own hours, their education, and their other behaviours.
These judges are idiots. Pure, unadulterated idiots.