Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Circulation of the Top 20 Newspapers
AP ^ | 5/2/05

Posted on 05/02/2005 3:33:52 PM PDT by Jean S

May 2, 2005

Circulation of the Top 20 Newspapers

The Associated Press


Average daily circulation of the nation's 20 biggest newspapers for the six months ended March 31, as reported Monday by the Audit Bureau of Circulations. The percentage changes are from the comparable year-ago period.

1. USA Today, 2,281,831, up 0.05 percent

2. The Wall Street Journal, 2,070,498, down 0.8 percent

3. The New York Times, 1,136,433, up 0.24 percent

4. Los Angeles Times, 907,997, down 6.5 percent (a)

5. The Washington Post, 751,871, down 2.7 percent

6. New York Daily News, 735,536, down 1.5 percent

7. New York Post, 678,086, up 0.01 percent

8. Chicago Tribune, 573,744, down 6.6 percent

9. Houston Chronicle, 527,744, down 3.9 percent (a)

10. San Francisco Chronicle, 468,739, down 6.1 percent (a)

11. The Arizona Republic, 452,016, down 3.2 percent (a)

12. The Boston Globe, 434,330, down 3.9 percent

13. The Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J., 394,767, down 1.6 percent

14. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 391,373, down 2.4 percent

15. Star Tribune of Minneapolis-St. Paul, 378,316, up 0.33 percent (a)

16. The Philadelphia Inquirer, 364,974, down 3.0 percent (a)

17. The Plain Dealer, Cleveland, 348,416, down 5.2 percent (a)

18. Detroit Free Press, 347,447, down 2.0 percent

19. St. Petersburg Times (Florida), 337,515, down 3.2 percent (a)

20. The Oregonian, Portland, 335,980, down 1.8 percent

---

Four newspapers were not allowed to include their circulation figures in the report released Monday as a penalty for misstating circulation figures in the past: Newsday of New York's Long Island; the Dallas Morning News; the Chicago Sun-Times and Hoy, a Spanish-language newspaper in New York. The first three papers were among the top 20 in the comparable reporting period a year ago.

(a) Includes Saturday circulation.

---

Source: Audit Bureau of Circulations.

---

On the Net:

http://www.accessabc.com

AP-ES-05-02-05 1751EDT


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: newspapers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 05/02/2005 3:33:52 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Down boy!


2 posted on 05/02/2005 3:35:16 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
By and large, the most biased newspapers are also the ones which have lost circulation. The two exceptions are the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times.

I have seen no explanation of why the Journal is down, rather than up. The Times is up, rather than down, because it is pursuing circulation outside the NY metropolitan area. For instance, the Times is available here, in the Blue Ridge Mountains. They CANNOT be making money on that effort. They have to be doing that to be able to tell their advertisers that their circulation has at least held constant.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, " 'L.A. Chappaquiddick,' Starring Hillary Clinton."

3 posted on 05/02/2005 3:40:40 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Proud to be a FORMER member of the Bar of the US Supreme Court since July, 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

LA Times....nice..


4 posted on 05/02/2005 3:40:40 PM PDT by ken5050 (The Dem party is as dead as the NHL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

It's no secret why USA subscription is high. Check into virtually any hotel and USA is available "free". At most finer hotels, you can have the price of 50 cents deducted from your bill if you don't want the paper. You have to take the initiative. This leads me to believe USA has a corporate account and bills many tens of thousands of papers without most hotel guests even aware.


5 posted on 05/02/2005 3:43:45 PM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

**19. St. Petersburg Times (Florida), 337,515, down 3.2 percent (a) **

I'm surprised the Miami Herald isn't bigger...or even the Sun Sentinel.

The Herald's is at 307,000.


6 posted on 05/02/2005 3:45:05 PM PDT by Guillermo (Vote for Pedro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

These figures are like their polls, they are stacked. A lot of newspapers are sold at certain times for discounted rates so they can show their circulation up and they can charge more for advertisement. I will bet the circulation on every main newspaper in this country is off from the year 2000. People have gotten wise and get most of their news from else ware.I haven't subscribed to a newspaper since 2000 and they use to call me with all kind of deals trying to get me back.


7 posted on 05/02/2005 3:45:14 PM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Save trees - don't read newspapers.


8 posted on 05/02/2005 3:50:13 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
I think the only reason the Gray Old Hag is up is only because of its highly aggressive subscription drive which basically gives the paper away. They call my house in MA at least once a month pleading and begging me to subscribe. I will bet you there are mounds of this paper that go unread and undistributed that are being counted as sales.

10-1 says that the NYT is caught fudging its numbers within a year. Ad Companies will be curious as to how the NYT managed to float while the others are sinking. They have been screwed a few times already and will be looking for savings.
9 posted on 05/02/2005 3:55:34 PM PDT by baystaterebel (F/8 and be there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
By and large, the most biased newspapers are also the ones which have lost circulation. The two exceptions are the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times.

However, both of their changes was so small it was insignificant.

10 posted on 05/02/2005 4:00:57 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel

Jayson Blair must be the new circulation manager for the Times. Even at that, it is comforting to note that the Wall Street Journal's circulation is nearly double that of the Times, and both are sold more or less nationally. And the continued plummeting of the LA Times is a thing of beauty -- they lost so many subscribers in the late 90s, I thought they had bottomed out, but maybe the bottom is still a long way down. Good news all around.


11 posted on 05/02/2005 4:03:06 PM PDT by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
Yes, a victory for the environment in more ways than one, including a reduction in air pollution.
12 posted on 05/02/2005 4:04:24 PM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob


Yes, I live in Maine and I have gotten calls pressuring me to take a NYT subscription. They are scrambling to keep ahead of the lost readership, I think.


13 posted on 05/02/2005 4:04:25 PM PDT by Fido969 (God? I'm not quite sure of what God is. I know what God isn't. God isn't me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Thanks for the info but I get my news either here or from "The Onion." ;)


14 posted on 05/02/2005 4:07:05 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

the nyt owns the boston globe, so things are worse than it first appears.

usa today, corporations are starting to realize that usa today hasn't many "quality readers" = readers who buy the paper intending to read it.

many of usa today's papers go to hotels and motels and the recipients do not read the papers.

so, expect usa today's advertising to go down.


15 posted on 05/02/2005 4:07:40 PM PDT by ken21 (if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Can't figure USA Today other than the fact that it is included in many hotel rate charges. USA Today seems to be equaled only by the NY Times in terms of bias. In one paper before the last Presidential election they had four articles relating to the candidates. The two on President Bush were critical nearly to the point of being riduculous and the two on JF Kerry made him out to be some kind of an angel landed on earth. That was the last USA Today I ever bothered to buy. For anyone with more than half a brain, it is a waste of money.


16 posted on 05/02/2005 4:10:30 PM PDT by onevoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
It looks like the top 10 newspapers combined perhaps have a circulation of less than 10 million. That's less than 5% of the population.

With the NYTimes only circulating 1.1mil in a metro area of at least 10 million, that's pretty sad.

Why do we even pay any attention to this archaic media?

17 posted on 05/02/2005 4:13:28 PM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Newspapers are todays equivalent of the 8-track.


18 posted on 05/02/2005 4:22:26 PM PDT by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

I would think circulation figures would be down just anyway.

What was happening in spring 2004? The War in Iraq was meeting heavy casualties. The Democrats were settling on a nominee. The media was doing their best to try to lunch Rumsfeld, Bush or both.

And what's been happening this spring?

Well, nothing other than the Pope dying and a new one getting elected. The Schiavo case was probably deep but not an issue many watched closely. The Iraqi elections might have been a major story if they hadn't gone so well.

So, just from general interest, newspaper readership should be down even aside from the leftist bias, the ancient technology and waste of foresty resources, the dumbing down of our children so fewer even bother to read and the laziness of our press to feed us polls and puffery rather than hard news.


19 posted on 05/02/2005 4:22:30 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (If you can think 180-degrees apart from reality, you might be a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speedy

The L.A. Times won't recover their circulation until they switch to a Spanish edition. The writing is on the billboard.


20 posted on 05/02/2005 4:23:51 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (If you can think 180-degrees apart from reality, you might be a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson