Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Budge

I guess Jeb is an environazi then, because he's the main guy standing in the way of drilling off Fla.

IMHO the author is a litttle misleading, because I'm pretty sure he includes oil shale in his estimate of US reserves. As has been stated on many FR, the breakeven cost to develop shale is still way, way above the current price of oil. And the process used to exctract oil from shale is so environmentally damaging as to give even the most ardent-prodevelopment conservative considerable pause--in a nutshell,, you end up with 50% more waste rock than you started with.

For shale to be even remotely practical we're going to have to find an extraction process that's both cleaner and cheaper than the way it's done now.


8 posted on 05/01/2005 8:11:34 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: kms61
"you end up with 50% more waste rock than you started with"

So... Aren't we mixing billions of tons of rock with oil (Asphalt) to make our highways anyway?
29 posted on 05/01/2005 9:19:11 PM PDT by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: kms61
-in a nutshell,, you end up with 50% more waste rock than you started with.

How is that possible? Is new rock created?

58 posted on 06/20/2005 3:07:41 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson