Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California's Arrogant Same-Sex 'Marriage' Bill
CNS News ^ | 4-29-05 | Lynn D. Wardle and Randy Thomasson

Posted on 04/29/2005 10:40:43 AM PDT by FlyLow

No lawmaker is above the law or the people. Yet state legislators who are pushing AB 19 show no respect for the constitution, laws or people of California.

AB 19, which would issue same-sex "marriage" licenses in every county in California, passed the Assembly Judiciary Committee on April 26.

Coauthored by 30 Democrats, AB 19 would repeal the people's vote on marriage. Displaying these legislators' sense of superiority over the voters, AB 19 is as good or bad an example of arrogance you can find. The Democrats who have coauthored this same-sex "marriage" bill apparently think they're above the law and above the voters.

Five years ago, 61.4 percent of Californians approved Proposition 22, the Protection of Marriage Initiative. The 14 words of the initiative were carefully crafted, reading: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."

The main author of AB 19, Democrat Assemblyman Mark Leno of San Francisco, claims that Prop. 22 forbids recognition of same-sex marriages from other states while allowing the creation of same-sex marriage here.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; homosexualagenda; markleno; marriage; samesexmarriage

1 posted on 04/29/2005 10:40:43 AM PDT by FlyLow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
This type of arrogance is usually rewarded with a boot out of office. Let hope our Californian brethren take the hint and wear steel toes.
2 posted on 04/29/2005 10:45:39 AM PDT by TXBSAFH (Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, who's bringing the chips?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow

They can CALL it anything they want, but if it is not ONE man & ONE woman, it is NOT a marriage!
Passing a law does not make a perversion right!


3 posted on 04/29/2005 10:46:07 AM PDT by Knute (W- Still the President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow

Does Californa provide for a constitutional amendment?

This time outlawing civil unions in addition to "alternate" form marriage.


4 posted on 04/29/2005 10:47:26 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Does Californa provide for a constitutional amendment?

Yes. There is already an effort to put a measure on the ballot to make Prop. 22 a constitutional amendment.

5 posted on 04/29/2005 10:49:33 AM PDT by socal_parrot (Turn the beat around!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
This is why I don't like the initiative process. If we had to live with what these thugs visit upon us, then the people would more readily boot them out. Votes for the legislature would have real, immediate, and irrevocable consequences without a change of party. Had the people not passed Proposition 13, the people of California would have dumped the Slave Party long ago.
6 posted on 04/29/2005 6:21:01 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson