Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harper vows to take down Liberals
National Post ^ | Wednesday, April 27, 2005 | Colin Perkel

Posted on 04/27/2005 2:40:11 PM PDT by fanfan

Harper vows to take down Liberals

AMHERSTBURG, Ont. -- Conservative Party Leader Stephen Harper vowed Wednesday to topple the fragile Liberal government "at the earliest opportunity" as he fumed about Paul Martin's "deal with the devil" -- a $4.6-billion budget agreement with the New Democrats.

Harper called Martin's willingness to accede to the NDP's demand to remove billions of dollars in corporate tax cuts from the federal budget the "most disgraceful thing" he'd ever seen as he tried to pin the blame for a snap election on the Liberal-NDP alliance.

"The prime minister went so far as to say that this arrangement in this particular episode shows that this Parliament works," Harper said during a luncheon speech in Amherstburg, a short drive south of Windsor, Ont.

"This is not how Parliament should work. As soon as we get back, I will be asking our caucus to put this government out of its misery at the earliest possible opportunity."

That could be as early as May 4, according to Conservative insiders who say that's the earliest date that a no-confidence motion that's currently before the public works committee could be brought before the House of Commons for a vote.

At an earlier stop in Ridgetown, Ont., Harper said the "fiscally irresponsible" deal to delay corporate tax cuts and siphon the $4.6-billion proceeds into social programs over the next two years was a sign the government is "seriously off the rails."

Harper said it would be impossible for Conservatives to support the budget, which favours NDP priorities and props up a government teetering on the brink of collapse from explosive allegations emerging daily from the Gomery inquiry into the federal sponsorship scandal.

In exchange for the changes to the budget, Layton has agreed to support the government in its effort to get the budget passed and in any no-confidence motions the Liberals face before the budget bill receives royal assent.

"We already have enough problems with Liberal corruption," Harper said. "Having an NDP budget is not going to make us support Liberal corruption."

But in an interview Wednesday with The Canadian Press, Martin said he intends to use a separate piece of legislation to push ahead with the tax cuts that were excised from the budget, provided the Conservatives are willing to support the move.

Planned cuts for small- and medium-sized businesses remain intact under the agreement, which calls for $4.6 billion in new investment over two years for the environment, affordable housing, foreign aid, and post-secondary education and training.

Speaking in Montreal, Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe also slammed the proposed budget changes and said he doesn't intend to support them.

"What's good for Quebec, we'll support," Duceppe said. "What's bad for Quebec, we'll oppose. The Layton-Martin agreement is not good for Quebec. It's not a good budget for Quebec."

During his own election-style tour of southwestern Ontario, Layton said seeking the deal was an act of conscience and that voters will cast judgment on his actions when they go to the polls.

"I understand the criticism, and not everybody's going to like what we're doing; that's life, that's why we have a democracy. People will execute their judgment on voting day," Layton told students during a question-and-answer session.

"I couldn't sleep at night if I knew that I had the chance to help some people get off the street and I didn't take it because I wanted the political advantage. I couldn't sleep at night."

Recent polls suggest Canadians do not want an election so soon after last spring's campaign, which has the leaders frantically passing the political hot potato of who will be to blame for touching off a spring campaign.

The Tories and Bloc are widely expected to try to bring down the government next month by voting against the budget or provoking another kind of non-confidence vote.

Even with NDP support, the Liberal government's survival is uncertain.

The Liberals would need all their 131 votes, the NDP's 19, and possibly those of all three independents, allowing the Liberal Speaker to cast the deciding ballot to bring the tally to 154.


TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adscam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

1 posted on 04/27/2005 2:40:17 PM PDT by fanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GMMAC; conniew; JudyinCanada; -YYZ-; backhoe; Grig; headsonpikes; West Coast Conservative; ...
GO STEPHEN!

PING

Please let me know if you want on or off the Adscam ping list

2 posted on 04/27/2005 2:41:29 PM PDT by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Hey Everyone,

Meet our 'new' (soon to be) Prime Minister Stephen Harper....


3 posted on 04/27/2005 3:00:42 PM PDT by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Add me to the ping list please!


4 posted on 04/27/2005 3:05:34 PM PDT by Dont Mention the War (Proud Member of the WPPFF Death Cult - We're coming after YOU next!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

5 posted on 04/27/2005 3:07:11 PM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
Harper vows to take down Liberals

Could she do that?


6 posted on 04/27/2005 3:08:58 PM PDT by South40 (Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Think this is going to happen and my Canadian cousins will have a conservative for a change?


7 posted on 04/27/2005 3:12:28 PM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

"Even with NDP support, the Liberal government's survival is uncertain.

The Liberals would need all their 131 votes, the NDP's 19, and possibly those of all three independents, allowing the Liberal Speaker to cast the deciding ballot to bring the tally to 154."

The margin for error in that calculation is zero.

Plus nobody has a clue what tricks Duceppe will pull.

May 4 is going to be very interesting indeed.


8 posted on 04/27/2005 4:00:06 PM PDT by beaver fever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

The Canadian "Conservatives" are kinda like US Democrats not like US Conservatives.

For example, the Canuck Conservative party platform explicitly supports socialized medicine!


9 posted on 04/27/2005 4:09:39 PM PDT by adam_az (Support the Minute Man Project - http://www.minutemanproject.com/Donations.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
What a bunch of whores the NDP are for this. They hopefully will be punished by the voters. It IS time to take the Liberals down for what to me is the most important reason. To stop the National Daycare Program. For one, I resent my tax money being used to baby sit some one else’s kids. My wife is a stay at home mom, but apparently she is not a productive member of society, so she will get squat from the government. Had she decided to abandon her children to strangers then she would be eligible to suck of the taxpayer teats. Secondly the program seeks to create government run daycares with union workers. Excuse me. Private daycare can come under regulatory scrutiny from government agencies. But who will scrutinize the government? We all know how well they regulate themselves. We will end up with a 100 billion dollar daycare program when its all said and done.
10 posted on 04/27/2005 4:21:20 PM PDT by Lord Nelson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

I was up in Vancouver on Saturday. Saw a suprisingly large number of NPD buttons on walkers in Stanley Park, as well as signs in both English and Chinese for NPD candidates.


11 posted on 04/27/2005 4:25:02 PM PDT by Clemenza (I am NOT A NUMBER, I am a FREE MAN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
To be fair in some ways Canadian Conservatives are far more conservative than Republicans. On fiscal issues, the CP believes in NO corporate welfare – ZERO, nadda.

Yes, they have not challenged Universal Healthcare. But you have to understand that Canadians are married to this system. They are the only nation which has not introduced serious reform such as user fees, or partial pay. If Harper ran on reforming healthcare he would end up with 10% of the popular vote. Canadians are mindless sheep when it come to healthcare. We want to maintain the status quo even though it is unsustainable. We somehow think there is some phantom tax base that can be taxed to keep the system afloat. That tax base leave Canada for more tax friendly harbours every year.
12 posted on 04/27/2005 4:26:33 PM PDT by Lord Nelson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
You were probably seeing buttons for the provincial NDP. There is a provincial election on. BCers tend to vote NDP provincially but not so much so federally. I don't really know why?
13 posted on 04/27/2005 4:28:03 PM PDT by Lord Nelson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

M'mmmmm ... bring it on !!!
14 posted on 04/27/2005 4:43:01 PM PDT by GMMAC (paraphrasing Parrish: "damned Liberals, I hate those bastards!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

I sure hope you're right about that fanfan.

By the way, where do I send the beer and nachos I will owe you if this actually happens?


15 posted on 04/27/2005 5:09:52 PM PDT by JudyinCanada (I can't wait, the dream is coming true and I will stand in front of the box to put my heart into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

Very cute, G.


16 posted on 04/27/2005 5:10:47 PM PDT by JudyinCanada (I can't wait, the dream is coming true and I will stand in front of the box to put my heart into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Amazing. So the Chinese hate communism enough to escape it, then do what they can to shove the closest thing to it down our throats by supporting the NDP. Go figure.


17 posted on 04/27/2005 5:12:47 PM PDT by JudyinCanada (I can't wait, the dream is coming true and I will stand in front of the box to put my heart into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada
Just for you Judy:

18 posted on 04/27/2005 5:15:01 PM PDT by GMMAC (paraphrasing Parrish: "damned Liberals, I hate those bastards!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

LOL.

I'd rather the sign read, "The Liberals are Going, The Liberals are Going!"


19 posted on 04/27/2005 5:20:56 PM PDT by JudyinCanada (I can't wait, the dream is coming true and I will stand in front of the box to put my heart into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lord Nelson
Yes, they have not challenged Universal Healthcare. But you have to understand that Canadians are married to this system.

Yes, I agree. I believe it's a case of getting rid of the liberals first. Then, we can look at other issues like healthcare.
20 posted on 04/27/2005 6:31:48 PM PDT by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson