Posted on 04/27/2005 12:18:08 PM PDT by AntiGuv
LOS ANGELES - A tabletop experiment created nuclear fusion — long seen as a possible clean energy solution — under lab conditions, scientists reported.
But the amount of energy produced was too little to be seen as a breakthrough in solving the world's energy needs
For years, scientists have sought to harness controllable nuclear fusion, the same power that lights the sun and stars. This latest experiment relied on a tiny crystal to generate a strong electric field. While falling short as a way to produce energy, the method could have potential uses in the oil-drilling industry and homeland security, said Seth Putterman, one of the physicists who did the experiment at the University of California, Los Angeles.
The experiment's results appear in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature.
Previous claims of tabletop fusion have been met with skepticism and even derision by physicists. In 1989, Dr. B. Stanley Pons of the University of Utah and Martin Fleischmann of Southampton University in England shocked the world when they announced that they had achieved so-called cold fusion at room temperature. Their work was discredited after repeated attempts to reproduce it failed.
Fusion experts noted that the UCLA experiment was credible because, unlike the 1989 work, it didn't violate basic principles of physics.
"This doesn't have any controversy in it because they're using a tried and true method," said David Ruzic, professor of nuclear and plasma engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. "There's no mystery in terms of the physics."
Fusion power has been touted as the ultimate energy source and a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels like coal and oil. Fossil fuels are expected to run short in about 50 years.
In fusion, light atoms are joined in a high-temperature process that frees large amounts of energy.
It is considered environment-friendly because it produces virtually no air pollution and does not pose the safety and long-term radioactive waste concerns associated with modern nuclear power plants, where heavy uranium atoms are split to create energy in a process known as fission.
In the UCLA experiment, scientists placed a tiny crystal that can generate a strong electric field into a vacuum chamber filled with deuterium gas, a form of hydrogen capable of fusion. Then the researchers activated the crystal by heating it.
The resulting electric field created a beam of charged deuterium atoms that struck a nearby target, which was embedded with yet more deuterium. When some of the deuterium atoms in the beam collided with their counterparts in the target, they fused.
The reaction gave off an isotope of helium along with subatomic particles known as neutrons, a characteristic of fusion. The experiment did not, however, produce more energy than the amount put in — an achievement that would be a huge breakthrough.
UCLA's Putterman said future experiments will focus on refining the technique for potential commercial uses, including designing portable neutron generators that could be used for oil well drilling or scanning luggage and cargo at airports.
cold fusion ping!
No, they pose other safety and waste concerns. (Neutron embrittlement of the reactor vessel is one obvious problem.)
That's nothing more than a neutron generator that's been around for a long time. I was doing that as an undergraduate physics major in the early 1970s using a clunky old Crockroft-Walton linac. It makes a neat demo experiment for physics classes, but isn't anything new or exciting.
AP would qualify the headline:
"Cure for Cancer"
"But no breakthrough in sight yet against gout"
Okay, who's got the picture of the 'Mr. Fusion' from "Back to the Future"?
Science ping.
|
(Neutron embrittlement of the reactor vessel is one obvious problem.)
Obviously!!
I find anything that has to do with nuclear fusion exciting. :p
I know it's not a huge breakthrough, but it's something.
Anneal the damage out or swap out the vessel. I had a design on the books for a nuclear plant with replaceable components (including the pressure vessel). Nobody was interested because they thought it was too much of a (financial) risk.
Well its about time. So lemme guess, it should be 5 to 10 years before we'll see this used?
" (Neutron embrittlement of the reactor vessel is one obvious problem.)"
That's the first thing I thought of too. :)
In order to be credible, it can't violate the rules of physics? We needed an expert to tell us this?
There's probably also contamination by neutron excitation of things just lying around, paperweights, beltbuckles, door locks, radiators, etc.
Nevertheless, it looks promising in about 50 years (same statement last year, next year....)
Well, it would seem to have some potential practical applications and moreover others can build on the research and get us closer & closer to the 'holy grail'.. Speaking of which, do you know what the status is of that experimental fusion reactor that's going to be built somewhere? The last I remember seeing about that was that there was a rivalry between France or Japan as to where it would end up, but that was some while ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.