Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tory fury as BBC sends hecklers to bait Howard
Telegraph ^ | 04/24/2005 | Patrick Hennessy

Posted on 04/24/2005 5:47:30 AM PDT by FreeperinRATcage

The BBC was last night plunged into a damaging general election row after it admitted equipping three hecklers with microphones and sending them into a campaign meeting addressed by Michael Howard, the Conservative leader.

The Tories have made an official protest after the hecklers, who were given the microphones by producers, were caught at a party event in the North West last week. Guy Black, the party's head of communications, wrote in a letter to Helen Boaden, the BBC's director of news, that the hecklers began shouting slogans that were "distracting and clearly hostile to the Conservative Party".

These included "Michael Howard is a liar", "You can't trust the Tories" and "You can only trust Tony Blair".

Mr Black's strongly-worded letter accused the BBC of staging the event "to generate a false news story and dramatise coverage. . . intended to embarrass or ridicule the leader of the Conservative Party". The letter said that BBC staff were guilty of "serious misconduct". At least one of the hecklers was seen again at a Tory event in the North East, Mr Black added.

Last night, the BBC claimed that the exercise was part of a "completely legitimate programme about the history and art of political heckling" and said that other parties' meetings were being "observed". However, The Telegraph has established that none of Tony Blair's meetings was infiltrated or disrupted in similar fashion.

The Conservatives have called for an apology and an assurance that no such incident will occur again. It has also demanded that the BBC promises never to broadcast the footage. The corporation said it would investigate "very fully". It and other broadcasters have a statutory duty to remain impartial during election campaigns. The corporation's guidelines for producers state: "Our audiences rightly expect the highest editorial and ethical standards from the BBC."

Tory officials became suspicious at the meeting in Horwich, near Bolton, last Wednesday, when they saw BBC camera crew focusing on the hecklers rather than Mr Howard. They twice challenged the two men and a woman involved, and discovered they had been equipped with radio microphones.

Mr Black said that they described themselves as "shoppers". In fact, they were under direction from a BBC team making a programme called The History of Heckling for the BBC3 channel. The programme, whose producer is Paul Woolwich, is in the process of being edited.

Mr Black's letter said of the hecklers: "It is entirely clear to me that the success of their presence required an element of performance on their behalf, and that this was a premeditated event intended to disrupt the course of Mr. Howard's speech.

"I do not believe that the BBC should be in the business of creating news. It also appears that the same crew was at the Michael Howard visit to Stockton-on-Tees and it can be no coincidence that someone with them was one of these 'hecklers'.

"I understand that Sally Freestone, the assignments editor UK Special Events, was 'aghast' that the BBC had engaged in such behaviour.

"This is a clear and serious breach of recognised BBC producer guidelines, and accordingly a breach of Section 5.3(b)1 of the BBC Charter Agreement. I also believe that the recordings which were taken of these organised hecklers, of ordinary members of the crowd and/or of Conservative officials who reacted and were recorded, would amount to 'surreptitious recording' under those guidelines."

Such recording requires advance approval from the relevant department head, Mr Black noted, and consultation with the BBC's controller, editorial policy. "Is it suggested that these requirements have been satisfied?" his letter asked, before concluding: "My disappointment with the BBC for this attempted coup d'theatre is profound." He addressed his letter to Ms Boaden, who took over as director of news from Richard Sambrook. Mr Sambrook, a key figure in the row between the Government and the BBC over the death of David Kelly, the Iraq weapons expert, is now director of the Corporation's World Service and Global News division.

Last night a BBC spokesman said: "This is a completely legitimate programme about the history and art of political heckling. The programme observes hecklers at other parties' campaign meetings and not just the Conservatives. The hecklers were not under the direction of the BBC and their activities did not disrupt the meeting in any way. The incident at the Michael Howard meeting only plays a small part in the overall programme. However, we will be investigating the complaint very fully and will be replying in due course."

The spokesman was unable to provide details of any other campaign meetings attended by the BBC3 crew. He said that the hecklers had not been paid a fee, but could not say whether they had received expenses. The dispute is the latest in many rows between the BBC and the Tories. Last autumn the Conservatives lodged an official complaint about Mr Howard's Newsnight interview earlier this year in which Jeremy Paxman questioned Mr Howard about the sacking of Derek Lewis, the head of the Prison Service, when he was home secretary in 1995. A Conservative spokesman claimed that the continued focus on the case of Mr Lewis, almost a decade after the event, showed the "endemic bias" of the BBC.

Many Conservatives are still angry about coverage of the May 2003 local elections when - despite the Tories gaining 565 council seats - the BBC focused on the resignation of Crispin Blunt, the shadow trade minister.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bbc; howard; liberalmedia; liberealmedia; michaelhoward; tory; ukelection; whatliberalbias

1 posted on 04/24/2005 5:47:31 AM PDT by FreeperinRATcage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FreeperinRATcage

The media is all about conflict and controversy and when they can't find it, they create it.


2 posted on 04/24/2005 5:55:03 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever killed or captured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I guess leftist scumbags are the same everywhere. They can't possibly win people over with their ideas so they have no choice but to resort to intimidation and childish antics.


3 posted on 04/24/2005 5:58:24 AM PDT by frankiep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreeperinRATcage
Last night a BBC spokesman said: "This is a completely legitimate programme about the history and art of political heckling.

And, no doubt they would have disclosed that fact when the program aired.
Yeah, right.
4 posted on 04/24/2005 5:58:48 AM PDT by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeperinRATcage
Last night a BBC spokesman said: "This is a completely legitimate programme about the history and art of political heckling

So,it goes without saying that we'll see an equivalent showing of Blair and that filthy Maoist (Charles Kennedy) being heckled.

5 posted on 04/24/2005 6:05:15 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

.....they create it......

Perhaps we shall soon be hearing about pressdeath. A new disease infecting psuedoreporters who influence elections by staging events for cameras.


6 posted on 04/24/2005 6:07:39 AM PDT by bert (Peace is only halftime !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MaryFromMichigan

I wonder how supportive the Tories will be next time they are in power and the BBC comes round for its annual handout at the socialist pig trough.


7 posted on 04/24/2005 6:11:08 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreeperinRATcage
BBC doesn't have anything on cBS!
8 posted on 04/24/2005 6:14:45 AM PDT by sausageseller (Look out for the jackbooted spelling police. There! Everywhere!(revised cause the "man" accosted me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeperinRATcage

I bet they got the idea from dem senators filibustering...


9 posted on 04/24/2005 7:20:16 AM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quantim

They got the idea from our Berkeley pie-tossers. They don't have the courage to run up and throw something, so they just yell leftist slogans.


10 posted on 04/24/2005 7:38:10 AM PDT by Pete98 (After his defeat by the Son of God, Satan changed his name to Allah and started over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pete98

This is outrageous. Libs worldwide wear the same stripes. How can this not open their eyes to liberal tactics? I'm sure they'll find a way. Idiots.


11 posted on 04/24/2005 7:55:51 AM PDT by chiller (DONE: Gore, taxes, terrorism,Kerry, Old Media. TO DO: Judges, Tort, IRS, Soc.Sec.,borders..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chiller
The trouble is because of the amount of apathy towards politics in Britain most people are not aware that the BBC is left wing (mind you Sky News IMHO has been even worse recently and they are owned by News International).

Most people in Britain still think the BBC is one of the most reliable sources of information and do not notice or understand the left wing bias through there own total lack of knowledge or interest in politics.

Over the last few years most people believe that big business runs the country and it does not really matter who is in power as they will just cow tail to the multi national international corporations in the long run, making the appropriate social issue comments to the public but in the long run will take their orders from the likes of Enron, Pfizer, Glaxo Beecham ICI etc.
12 posted on 04/24/2005 8:17:21 AM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreeperinRATcage
BBC is PBS on steroids.
13 posted on 04/24/2005 9:58:38 AM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeperinRATcage
I am waiting on this thread for all the "Redcoats" to start blasting the BBC.

It seems, true to form they are MIA!

14 posted on 04/24/2005 10:16:59 AM PDT by sausageseller (Look out for the jackbooted spelling police. There! Everywhere!(revised cause the "man" accosted me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snugs

> ...in Britain most people are not aware that the BBC is left wing

Maybe the Beeb's sending hecklers to a Tory campaign rally was just practicing for how they plan to cover the big show up in Gleneagles in July.


15 posted on 04/24/2005 10:23:48 AM PDT by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sausageseller
I am waiting on this thread for all the "Redcoats" to start blasting the BBC.

This is very typical of the B.B.C. which has shown a distinct bias in its reporting against the Conservative Party for many years - so much so that much of the time we don't even bother to pay attention. It's not so much M.I.A. as 'oh really we knew about that 10 years ago'.

Mind you, I can't say that I've been overly impressed with many FReepers' reactions to the British election either - there seems to be a fog of consciousness over reality when it comes to consideration of Tony Blair - whereby otherwise reasonable people go weak at the knees and actually support him.
16 posted on 04/24/2005 11:53:48 AM PDT by tjwmason (Viva il Papa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tjwmason
One peeps up!

Mind you ,I can say I am not overly impressed with many redcoats reactions, or lack there of!

How about rallying you tribe of "those with many posting names", to attack the BBC instead of your same old attacks of Freepers. I know your crew never tire of that. So give it a rest.

17 posted on 04/24/2005 2:49:50 PM PDT by sausageseller (Look out for the jackbooted spelling police. There! Everywhere!(revised cause the "man" accosted me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sausageseller
How about rallying you tribe of "those with many posting names", to attack the BBC instead of your same old attacks of Freepers.

We never attacked FReepers, what we did was defend the reputation of our country against unwarranted attacks - the entire purpose was to provide a co-ordinated response to large-scale misunderstanding. As there is no such misunderstanding about the B.B.C., with every FReeper I know realising its bias, there is no such call for a co-ordinated response.
18 posted on 04/25/2005 1:28:03 AM PDT by tjwmason (Viva il Papa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tjwmason
We never attacked FReepers,

LOL I know better!

what we did was defend the reputation of our country against unwarranted attacks - the entire purpose was to provide a co-ordinated response to large-scale misunderstanding. As there is no such misunderstanding about the B.B.C., with every FReeper I know realising its bias, there is no such call for a co-ordinated response.

That is exactly why I disparage your bunch. The opposite is why Freepers are effective in America. This could be your "Dan Rather " moment if you would concentrate your efforts on the real enemy instead of your perceived one. Instead of sitting on your laurels carping and violating FR posting rules, you should enjoy the US freepers in a fight to smash the BBC! Much less the confiscatory tax to fund them!

19 posted on 04/25/2005 5:22:59 AM PDT by sausageseller (Look out for the jackbooted spelling police. There! Everywhere!(revised cause the "man" accosted me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson