Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JBW
If I read through the gobbledy gook correct, this case has nothing to do with the first amendment. A private person
The first amendment restrains the GOVERNMENT from obstructing free speech not a private party or company.
4 posted on 04/22/2005 8:31:43 AM PDT by Bar-Face
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bar-Face

Thanks for the clarification. I was probably not as accurate as I should have been in naming this post.

What was interesting to me, however, was the conflict between free speech and an employer's responsibility to prevent a "hostile work environment". That conflict was at issue in the Janice Rogers Brown dissent in Aguilar v. Avis Rent-A-Car.

Brown is under fire for reasoning that the courts should not be allowed to enjoin offensive speech in the workplace in the context of a Title VII discrimination case. Her critics have charged that she was too sensitive to First Amendment concerns and not sufficiently sensitive to the needs of employees to be free from harassment at work.

The Shearman v. Doe lawsuit, I thought, was a good example of how work place discrimination concerns could go too far in squelching the free speech rights of others. It was in that context that I posted the ABA Journal article.

Hope this helps.


7 posted on 04/22/2005 8:58:01 AM PDT by JBW (www.jonathanbwilson.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson