Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ProudVet77

I believe I once read that the C-130 was specially fitted for vertical take-off and landings, or that they experimented with the idea but it crashed miserably during testing. It was specifically intended for this mission.


3 posted on 04/18/2005 11:48:41 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: SteveMcKing
"C-130 was specially fitted for vertical take-off and landings"
Whoever came up with that idea needed a proctologist to find what was left of his mind. To lift a C-130 straight up would take massive horsepower.
4 posted on 04/19/2005 12:12:14 AM PDT by ProudVet77 (It's boogitty boogitty boogitty season!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SteveMcKing

"I believe I once read that the C-130 was specially fitted for vertical take-off and landings, or that they experimented with the idea but it crashed miserably during testing. It was specifically intended for this mission."


Not quite.

What happened was that a plan was devised for a C-130 to land in the soccer field near the hostage site. To allow for the short landing field a series of retro-rockets were fitted to the forward section of the C-130. In testing the pilot lit the rockets while at still too high an altitude and the plane virtually stopped in midair, and fell to its destruction.

Pictures of a test are online somewhere. I recall seeing them in the last several years.


9 posted on 04/19/2005 2:19:49 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson