Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this the New Racism?
4/18/2005 | TIM MCAULIFFE

Posted on 04/18/2005 10:00:13 AM PDT by tmcauliff656

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 04/18/2005 10:00:16 AM PDT by tmcauliff656
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tmcauliff656

Source link?


2 posted on 04/18/2005 10:02:46 AM PDT by andyandval
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tmcauliff656
One can only hope this is the new racism.

Nobody much cares for the old racism anymore.

3 posted on 04/18/2005 10:04:43 AM PDT by LilDarlin (Being very feminine got me this far; it will get me the rest of the way, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tmcauliff656

I'm confused.


4 posted on 04/18/2005 10:06:50 AM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tmcauliff656

Your friends don't call you McAwful do they?


5 posted on 04/18/2005 10:07:59 AM PDT by andyandval
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tmcauliff656

Do you work for Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton? Are you one of those race-baiters that claims to hate racism, while fanning the flames? Are you for real?


6 posted on 04/18/2005 10:08:16 AM PDT by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tmcauliff656

You got a point?


7 posted on 04/18/2005 10:12:26 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tmcauliff656

Got toast?


8 posted on 04/18/2005 10:13:54 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tmcauliff656; MeekOneGOP; mhking; Darksheare; Slings and Arrows; rdb3

BTTT


9 posted on 04/18/2005 10:14:03 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix
I've had my fill of this nonsense for today.


10 posted on 04/18/2005 10:15:27 AM PDT by rdb3 (To the world, you're one person. To one person, you may be the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tmcauliff656

It's considered bad form for newbees to post vanities, old boy. Like chilling claret or beating someone else's wife, it's *just not done* in the best circles.


11 posted on 04/18/2005 10:16:13 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Deadcheck the embeds first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
it's *just not done* in the best circles

And we try not to do it here either.

12 posted on 04/18/2005 10:18:44 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tmcauliff656

tmcauliff656
Since Apr 18, 2005


13 posted on 04/18/2005 10:19:39 AM PDT by MisterRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tmcauliff656; MeekOneGOP
Welcome to Free Republic


Does it seem like someone's watching?

14 posted on 04/18/2005 10:20:56 AM PDT by SmithL (Proud Submariner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; general_re; hellinahandcart; Constitution Day; BlueLancer; mhking; rdb3; Tijeras_Slim; ...
.
Whoever manages to decipher this should take a crack at Ooni of Ife.
15 posted on 04/18/2005 10:24:38 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tmcauliff656

Yep the "Race Card" is always good for a couple of news stories here in the USA isn't it..[/rolling eyes...


16 posted on 04/18/2005 10:25:26 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: tmcauliff656

http://www.roper2005.com/bio.shtml

Why don't you just come out and say that your "Aditorial" is part of Roper's 2005 campaign? Democrats and socialists need to pay for space and airtime just like everybody else.


18 posted on 04/18/2005 10:36:19 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Let the Constitution do the talkin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NucSubVet
Works for me


Clicky - clicky

19 posted on 04/18/2005 10:36:28 AM PDT by SmithL (Proud Submariner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tmcauliff656

Here's a Brooklyn blogger who likes to comment on these things:



ROPER A NO-HOPER? At first glance, Sandra Roper might not seem like a strong candidate for district attorney of a county with 2.5 million people.

Her small-time lawyer’s résumé doesn’t suggest she’s supervised an office of any size, let alone one with more than two dozen bureaus and hundreds of prosecutors and investigators. And her fundraising history gives no indication she can raise anywhere near the $500,000 or more insiders say is needed to contend.

But her supporters believe Roper, 48, a part-time pharmacist, has a few factors in her favor.

“She’s a scientist. There are no other scientists in the race,” said political insurgent John O’Hara, noting the increasing role of science and technology in law enforcement.

Assuming the scientist vote won’t be enough to win, what other votes can Roper hope for?

First, votes of sympathy and outrage, if Roper can continue to cast herself as a poster child for white oppression based on her indictment, even though it was recently dismissed.

Second, the black vote, since she’s black. Third, the Latino vote, since she’s a native of Panama. “Her middle name is Elena,” O’Hara explained, and it will appear on the ballot, he said.

Fourth, the pro-woman vote. “I’ve never seen a countywide race where one woman runs against five guys and loses,” O’Hara said. (The other candidates raising money are incumbent Joe Hynes, Mark Peters, State Senator John Sampson, Paul Wooten, and Arnie Kriss.)

One problem here is that while voters tend to favor female judges, they prefer male prosecutors. That’s the conventional wisdom, though it doesn’t always hold true (for example, Liz Holtzman was Brooklyn’s D.A. from 1982 to 1989).

But the larger impediment for Roper and the other challengers is that incumbent district attorneys just don’t lose reelection bids in New York City. Any reader who remembers one, please let us know.


20 posted on 04/18/2005 10:37:31 AM PDT by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson