[llortami]

LOL. OK. But you could at least try to answer my question

[CHARLITE]

The Constitution doesn't say a thing about filibustering, so you're right in one sense - that it "can't be unconstitutional, if the Constitution doesn't mention it."

However, the advice & consent duties of the congress with respect to any president's prerogative in appointing judges only requires a simple majority which is 51 votes. Therefore, the sudden demand on the part of the Democrat opposition, that rules for breaking a filibuster be applied to dealing with judicial nominees IS unconstitutional.