Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ancient_geezer
SAW LINDER AND ART LAFFER!!!

Kudlow did a great setup by throwing an unannotated Code into the "dustbin of history!"

Laffer was very complimentary to the Flat Tax and The Fair Tax. His view is that they are different sides of the same coin.

Linder corrected him, and said that a flat income tax doesn't remain flat for very long. I thought Linder did a good job explaining specifics. Kudlow set him up for the home run by asking about the position of the National Retail Federation. Linder countered immediately by explaining the Embedded tax cost. Linder also discussed the 16th, although not in as much detail.

In all, it was another very favorable, national exposure!!!!
12 posted on 04/15/2005 2:52:20 PM PDT by Conservative Goddess (Veritas vos Liberabit, in Vino, Veritas....QED, Vino vos Liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Conservative Goddess

I love to see and hear Art Laffer, because he is pointed in the right direction, optimistic and really has a good mind combined with good intentions. But I just have to go after him on the "flat tax is the other side of the coin of the consumption tax." Perhaps he just understands better what his interpretation is, but I don't see it. Kudlow said on the flat tax: everyone just totals everything they make and sends in 13% of it. That doesn't work!! Take a supermarket, for example. They sell a lot for very little margin of profit, maybe 2%. They (and every other business) must be permitted their costs of production, cost of sales or what have you; they cannot pay taxes on total revenues. And those deductions are where the complexities come in, not in the rate of taxation. Plus, as JL said, we passed a flat tax in 1913, and close to it again in 1986, and the income tax has been amended 10,000 times since '86. The flat tax is an approach to keeping the income tax in place; in fact, it is an income tax. JL says the Fair Tax does not want to co-exist with the income tax for a single moment, because both would grow back to be big taxes.


14 posted on 04/15/2005 3:12:07 PM PDT by n-tres-ted (Remember November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson