Posted on 04/14/2005 9:16:57 PM PDT by CHARLITE
Great read. Almost as good as the responses. If it gets too slow this weekend, I'll have to bump this up a few times.
How'd ya spell r e v i s i o n i s t?
And the homeless came back out, too.
"The most recent such revelation suggests that Mr. Clinton would have reformed Social Security in his second term if he had not been distracted by those dastardly and unnecessary impeachment proceedings. Such are the proclamations in a San Francisco Chronicle front-page story entitled "Social Security rehab died first under Clinton.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/04/11/MNGKIC697J1.DTL
Sheppard then goes on to mock and ridicule the liberal female writer's desperate attempt to exonerate Clinton for not having kept his weak, non-substantial campaign and grandstanding promises to reform Social Security.
From your posted comment, I got the impression that you thought that it was the writer of the article (Noel Sheppard) who is the revisionist. He's not. It's the author of the S.F. Chronicle article who is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.