When I saw that Mouth That Roared headline, I thought they were going to write about Chris Mouthphews of PMSNBC.
If Clinton wants to bash queers, maybe he should include his so-called wife -- equal treatment under the law, right??? My God, what loathsome people!
Hey! Even I like to snuggle up to a Bush once in a while.
LOL! All I can sit here and do is laugh. If anyone that thought Bill was going to really back Hillary in a run for President, then I have some swamp land for sale in Arizona. Never was going to happen. He will continue to find ways to undermine her IMHO which is great for our side.
With J.C. Superstar still kickin' around, that takes some doing.
I've never understood why the Clinton's are perceived as "brilliant". They sure seem to do and to say stupid things with great regularity.
I remember a time when Tony Blankley told Eleanor Clift that Bill Clinton could shoot a little old lady on the street and some people in the press would defend Clinton by saying that "the little old lady had to die sometime, anyway". Clinton will continue to make an ass of himself and the MSM will either ignore it or pooh-pooh it. The Fems didn't care about what he did. Pigs is Pigs, I guess.
Clinton can do no wrong, according to the liberals. Therefore, he gets a free pass on everything he says and does. Liberals hate this Republican gay man, because he is good at cleaning their clocks. So he is fair game for the scum, and they will back Clinton every time.
Ummm, the Daily News isn't the liberal rag, yer thinking of the Times.
This statement assumes that the person in question has some sense of morality and connection to other human beings, and understands that rushing to judgement is wrong because we have all sinned. Clinton, as the article points out, simply is too narcisstic. He can't see beyond his own needs.
The Klinton's can do and say just about anything and their defenders will love them all the more.
Name it and Clinton is "beneath it."
I'm not so sure that any ex-president could go lower than Carter.
thanks for posting this article, areafiftyone. It warms my heart to know that what goes around, actually does come around.
This is an interesting data point for Left-ologists to ponder. Apparently gays, even Republican ones, trump Clinton. What to make of it...?
Whoa.... The New York DAILY NEWS wrote this???
Clingon ain't smart!
Cunning, yes, but not smart!
Slick has no feelings of guilt. Like all liberals, he is amoral. They seem to have certain moral standards, like rights for every group they can isolate except conservatives, because they will skew anything to try to nail a Republican and/or conservative. When they throw a big hissy fit over some pretended slight to women, blacks, homos, children, the handicapped, the poor, the elderly, etc., it is just to blast their opposition and cast them as uncaring and mean. The assumption is that because of their opposition to the other side and their grand huff over something they made up, they feel the opposite. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Just as many of us attribute human qualities to animals, we also attribute moral qualities to liberals. That is a mistake. Morals to liberals are like the SS trust fund, non existent. The SS scam is a good metaphor for liberals in general.
Pray for W and Our Troops