Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's container ship fleet and Taiwan's security (MUST READ, chinese sneak attack?)
The American Thinker ^ | April 11th, 2005 | Frederick W. Stakelbeck, Jr.

Posted on 04/11/2005 10:43:31 AM PDT by CitadelArmyJag

China's container ship fleet and Taiwan's security April 11th, 2005

China is busily building a fleet of the largest container ships the world has ever seen. That is a boon for its export trade and economic efficiency. But like the Trojan Horse of ancient Greek civilization, the fleet could potentially be used by China in a spectacular, lightening invasion of Taiwan. Could the hollow hulls and empty decks of Chinese container ships carry infantry and mechanized divisions for a devastating attack on Taiwan, securing the island before the U.S. could respond?

The thought of mammoth Chinese container ships carrying an amphibious invasion force across the Strait of Taiwan is certainly frightening. But the capability for just such an invasion is slowly being put in place.

The Chinese have plans to build several 90,000 ton-plus container ships capable of carrying 8,530-TEUs (Twenty Feet Equivalent Units).* In an agreement announced in November 2004, Chinese shipbuilder Hudong-Zhonghua Shipbuilding (Group) Co., Ltd. announced it will deliver 4-5 of the giant container ships to the China Shipping Group by October 2008. When completed, the new ships will surpass the Republic of Korea’s 8,000-TEU as the largest container ships in the world.

Supplementing increased construction and advances in the container ship industry have been developments in China’s amphibious capabilities. The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) is building amphibious ships at a breakneck pace. The ships include nine large Yuting 072- II class LSTH; the Yunshu class LSM; a new 64 meter LCU; a number of medium landing ships; and the construction of LSDs and LPDs with flight decks for attack helicopters. Solidifying China’s stranglehold on the world’s merchant fleet is the country’s rapid ascension as a world leader in commercial ship repair and conversion services. These complex projects can now be completed at a number of shipyards throughout China. Its largest ship repair organization, the China Ocean Shipping Company (COSCO) Shipyard, operates the Nantong shipyard near Shanghai, which is increasingly handling tanker, container and bulk carrier repairs and conversions. Separately, the Dailan and Guangzhou shipyards, among the country’s largest repair facilities, also expect rapid growth and increased investment in the near future.

The largest producer of ship containers in the world is also a Chinese company. China International Marine Containers (CIMC) ranks as the world leader in container manufacturing, with over 40 percent of the international container market. These containers can be custom built to specifications with louvered vents and electric power added to make a working, livable environment that is virtually sound-proof. Containers can also be armored and include partitions to conceal individuals or large items.

Entranced by economic opportunity, the Taiwanese are inadvertently making a possible Chinese container ship invasion a reality. In May 2004, ground was broken for construction of the first container center at the Port of Taipei. The new center is expected to save several hundred million dollars in transport costs and make the port an attractive location for investment. Located at the mouth of the Danshuei River in northern Taiwan, the Port of Taipei is one-hundred and thirty-four miles from Fuzhou Harbor in mainland China.

Further improvements to the Port of Taipai’s transportation infrastructure are scheduled for completion in 2008 – the same year that the last of the great 90,000 ton container ships will be delivered to the China Shipping Group. Included in these improvements will be the completion of the Bali-Wugu section of an east-west expressway. This will allow for the easy transport of containers from the Port of Taipei via the expressway, or a link with Chiang Kai-shek International Airport via the West Coast Highway, which is currently being widened.

A Chinese invasion of Taiwan has been compared by some to the allied invasion of Normandy and McArthur’s landing at Inchon during the Korean War. The D-Day Normandy invasion of 1944 transported 176,000 amphibious troops; used three airborne divisions; 10,000 aircraft, 136 warships, 3,000 landing craft and 2,000 support ships. Available intelligence reports suggest that the Chinese can assemble 15,000 amphibious troops, three airborne divisions, 3,300 aircraft, 60 warships and 300 landing craft for an invasion of Taiwan. In addition, a support force of 50,000 ground troops of the Chinese 31st Army Group now deployed at the Nanjing Military Region could be made available for an invasion with another 250,000 troops loaded onto container ships for an assault on Taiwan. According to Wang Jisi, Director of the Chinese Institute of Strategy at the Central Party School, “the danger of war truly exists. We are not a paper tiger. We are a real tiger.”

In theory, a covert assault using Chinese container ships is possible. But like the Normandy invasion, most, if not all, of the operational and contingency planning involved in such a large-scale amphibious invasion would have to be precise and error-free. A fleet of container ships would have to unload men and material in an extremely fast, cohesive manner, probably under constant fire from Taiwanese ground, navel and air forces.

Loading docks in the Port of Taipei would need to be cleared for immediate military offloading operations. Major roads leading out of the port would have to be secured by airborne units of the Chinese 43rd, 44th and 45th divisions or advance units of a special operations force (SOF) attached to the invading amphibious force.

Once secured, the port would require continuous patrolling to propel a retaliatory naval or air assault on container ships unloading at the port. Air cover using a combination of attack helicopters and fighters from the decks of ships in port or from airfields secured by Chinese airborne units would be necessary. The imposition of a rigorous naval shield using China’s fleet of diesel and nuclear powered submarines would be needed to diminish threats from the United States and its allies.

French Exocet SM-39 anti-ship missiles known as “carrier killers,” 3M-80 Moskit Sunburn missiles, developed by the Chinese specifically to defeat the U.S. Aegis air-defense system, or cruise missiles launched from Russian-made Su-30 fighters could also be used to attack U.S. assets in the Pacific. Deployed on submarines, fighters, frigates, or mainland China, cruise missiles could inflict considerable damage and innumerable casualties on U.S. Naval Forces in the early hours of a conflict. This would effectively mitigate an overwhelming response from the U.S. and prompt a tactical regrouping of U.S. forces for a coordinated counteroffensive that could take several weeks or months to organize.

A southern Chinese invasion force made up of container ships and Chinese naval support ships could land near the ancient city of Tainan situated on the southwestern coastal plains of Taiwan. As one of the island’s largest cities with a population of approximately 700,000 residents, Tainan’s transportation system includes a major airport that, if secured by Chinese airborne units, would allow for accelerated troop movements north. The Tainan Airport, a public facility as well as an air base, is well-known to Chinese military strategists. Railway lines and highways leading north to Taipei already exist and are large enough to handle large supply trucks, tanks and armored vehicles.

Adding credibility to the hypothesis of a possible Chinese container-based invasion of Taiwan, the United States itself is now considering using container ships in support of naval operations, and plans to explore the conversion of container ships for military purposes. Working with Maersk Line Ltd., the U.S. Navy is considering its Maritime Prepositioning Force (MPF) Future Program with a modified S-class commercial container ship. The 1,140 feet long ship is designed to offload cargo for 6,000 troops and maintain a flight deck for the V-22 Osprey tiltrotor aircraft. Working with architectural firm Gibbs & Cox and ship conversion company Norshipco, the proposed ship will be outfitted with ramps, a loading platform and stern and bow thrusters. Construction is scheduled to begin in 2007. Hovercrafts would be used to deliver cargo to shore.

China has embarked on a determined mission to surpass both Japan and South Korea as the world’s leading shipbuilder. The Chinese can now offer state-of-the-art shipbuilding, repair and conversion services as a result of increased domestic and foreign investment in maritime modernization projects. With improved shipbuilding production methods, modern capital equipment for its shipyards, and significant progress in the areas of ship design, China’s shipbuilding industry deserves the attention of the U.S. and its Pacific allies as a possible national security threat.

Would China undertake a container-based invasion of Taiwan? This is an intriguing question which merits our attention as China approaches superpower status.

_________

*The unit TEU (twenty-foot equivalent unit) is used to express the relative number of containers based on the equivalent length of a 20' container. For example, 100 containers of 20' is 100 TEUs, while 100 containers of 40' is 200 TEUs, Export 911, http://www.export911.com/e911/ship/conShip.htm.

Frederick W. Stakelbeck, Jr., is a freelance journalist residing in Philadelphia

Frederick W. Stakelbeck, Jr.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asia; china; commiepinkochinese; containerships; geopolitics; navy; taiwan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
Very interesting read...
1 posted on 04/11/2005 10:43:36 AM PDT by CitadelArmyJag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CitadelArmyJag
Spotlight on Waterway Watch

Waterway Watch is the initial and primary Coast Guard Auxiliary program launched as a component of  Operation Patriot Readiness,
and is a major part of the Coast Guard's maritime security initiative.

Waterway Watch promotes public awareness and involvement in Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA)
and Maritime Homeland Security (MHLS) activities.

Waterway Watch involves all Auxiliarists, both those performing direct operational missions
and those involved in Recreational Safe Boating operational support activities.


CLICK ON THE GRAPHIC BELOW TO WATCH
A 15 MINUTE VIDEO ON Waterway Watch

Or copy and paste this url
http://www.cgauxed.org/waterway/waterwaywatch.asx
in your Windows Media Player
TIP : Check your settings and set it for Full Screen


2 posted on 04/11/2005 10:47:17 AM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Dept of Homeland Security Plank Owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitadelArmyJag

China's communistic aspirations extend far beyond just Taiwan when it comes to the waterways. I was in Singapore recently, talking with some of the locals and they are quite concened about China's efforts to gain access to waterways all around Southeast Asia...it has been going on for some time. It is hard evidence to China's expansionist efforts. And the last thing that China should get is trust.


3 posted on 04/11/2005 10:48:05 AM PDT by EagleUSA (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitadelArmyJag

Soldiers packed into containers will make great coffins for the attackers. As if our satellites can't see that. Stealth technology - we have it, they don't. It's like fighting a machine gun nest with rocks.


4 posted on 04/11/2005 10:48:12 AM PDT by Waterleak (I pity the fool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitadelArmyJag

The main problem is how to keep such an invasion covert. If it is tipped off, those container amphib vessels would be gigantic coffins.


5 posted on 04/11/2005 10:48:52 AM PDT by Semper Paratus (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Ping!


6 posted on 04/11/2005 10:49:47 AM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CitadelArmyJag

Trojan ships!!


7 posted on 04/11/2005 10:50:38 AM PDT by Finalapproach29er (America is gradually becoming the Godless,out-of-control golden-calf scene,in "The Ten Commandments")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I agree... And to think that Old Europe wants to lift the military trade ban with the Chinese...

Scary...


8 posted on 04/11/2005 10:50:51 AM PDT by CitadelArmyJag ("Tolerance is the virtue of the man with no convictions" G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CitadelArmyJag

First Tawain, then Long Beach and the Port of New Jersey.


9 posted on 04/11/2005 10:51:48 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Borders language culture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitadelArmyJag

I dunno. We have to assume that the Taiwanese are at least as smart as us, and if a bunch of brand new shiny container ships, running low in the water and with doors in the wrong places, started making their way to Taiwan at the same time, they might get suspicous. It wouldn't take much firepower to send all of that defenseless equipment to the bottom of the ocean.


10 posted on 04/11/2005 10:54:04 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitadelArmyJag

Taiwanese ground, navel and air forces.

I wonder if this includes the infamous Taiwanese LINT commandos.:P


11 posted on 04/11/2005 10:55:01 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

Agreed, but who would have the nerve to order up a torpedo until after the start of hostilities?


12 posted on 04/11/2005 10:55:33 AM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

And Condi just needs a "Belgrado" moment to round off her extensive resume.


13 posted on 04/11/2005 10:57:53 AM PDT by spokeshave (Strategery + Schardenfreude = Stratenschardenfreudery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

see next post


14 posted on 04/11/2005 10:58:24 AM PDT by spokeshave (Strategery + Schardenfreude = Stratenschardenfreudery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Waterleak

That was my read on the article. Whether or not our satellites detected the move, I doubt very much the Chinese would risk doing something like this. They couldn't know for sure they weren't detected and that their invasion force wouldn't be destroyed en route. Way too risky in my view.


15 posted on 04/11/2005 11:00:38 AM PDT by fire and forget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CitadelArmyJag

Save.


16 posted on 04/11/2005 11:01:06 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: CitadelArmyJag; Jeff Head

The container troop concept was used in recent fiction books.

Was that one of your, Jeff?


18 posted on 04/11/2005 11:01:57 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitadelArmyJag

Yes, an interesting read, but I'm sure the Pentagon and Taiwan's equivalent are thinking of similar scenarios and what to do about them.


19 posted on 04/11/2005 11:02:33 AM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er

Very simple to stop - Taiwan could announce a national policy that each container ship from Red China must heave-to 10 miles offshore to take on a Taiwanese harbor pilot and military special operator inspectors ("trip wires") under combat air cover. Ships that do not stop would be considered hostile and subject to boarding by marines or be sunk.


20 posted on 04/11/2005 11:03:32 AM PDT by astounded (We don't need no stinkin' rules of engagement...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson