Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judiciary has `run amok,' DeLay says
Knight Ridder Newspapers ^ | Apr. 07, 2005 | James Kuhnhenn

Posted on 04/08/2005 3:04:43 PM PDT by kingattax

WASHINGTON - House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, stepped up his attack on federal judges Thursday, telling a gathering of religious conservatives that the judiciary has "run amok" and demanding that Congress assert authority over the courts.

His remarks, delivered by videotape, broadened the criticism he voiced last week after the death of Terri Schiavo, a severely brain-damaged woman in Florida, after judges refused to order her feeding tube reinserted.

DeLay's address came as he strives to shore up his base amid a storm over his ethics. Liberal groups have launched ads attacking his connections to lobbyists and former associates now under investigation. Prominent news reports have raised questions about his use of campaign cash, and last year the House ethics committee rebuked him three times in one week.

Many lawmakers think DeLay can weather the storm as long as he's perceived as a leader of the conservative movement.

"The judiciary branch of our government has overstepped its authority on countless occasions, overturning and in some cases just ignoring the legitimate will of the people," DeLay said. "But I also believe the executive and legislative branches have neglected the proper checks and balances on this behavior ... Our next step, whatever it is, must be more than rhetoric."

Criticism of the courts by religious conservatives has mounted since the Schiavo case. At issue is extraordinary legislation that Congress passed and President Bush signed late last month that ordered federal courts to review the case, in which Schiavo's husband and parents disputed what her wishes would be. A federal judge in Florida refused to overturn a state court's decision and the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld his ruling. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal.

After Schiavo died last week, DeLay said federal judges "thumbed their nose at Congress and the president. The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior."

Congress could inject itself into the judiciary by simply calling on judges to testify before Congress, a move that could be interpreted as intimidation. It also could intervene more dramatically, by initiating impeachment procedures, passing legislation limiting judges' terms in office or redefining the jurisdiction of federal courts in certain types of cases.

Intervention by the Congress, however, does not sit well with some conservatives.

John J. Pitney Jr., a political scientist at Claremont McKenna College and a former Republican congressional aide, said: "A lot of conservatives may strongly disapprove of what the courts are doing but don't think it's proper to punish judges for the decisions. They regard that as a breach of separation of powers."

Even Congress' attempt to influence the Schiavo case prompted a strong rebuke by one of the judges deciding the matter. Circuit Judge Stanley F. Birch Jr., appointed to the court by President Bush's father, said, "Congress chose to overstep constitutional boundaries into the province of the judiciary. Such an act cannot be countenanced."

Republican lawmakers too are splintered over whether to take on the judicial branch of government. On Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., distanced himself from DeLay, saying he thought the judges in the Schiavo case had given her case a "fair and independent look."

"I believe we have a fair and independent judiciary today," Frist added.

DeLay had been scheduled as the keynote speaker before the Judeo-Christian Council for Constitutional Restoration, but sent in taped remarks because the conference conflicted with his trip to Rome for Pope John Paul II's funeral.

"Our judiciary has banned prayer in schools and evicted Christmas displays from town halls," DeLay said. He complained that judges were ignoring legislatures and "following the dictates of foreign opinion," a reference to a recent Supreme Court decision on the death penalty.

"These are not the examples of a mature society, but of a judiciary run amok," DeLay said.

His stand-in at the conference was Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, a DeLay ally who chairs a courts subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee.

"Judges continue to substitute their own political views for the law, and we must push back," Smith said. Asked whether he would take steps to retaliate against judges in the Schiavo case, Smith said: "I would certainly be a part of any effort that Tom DeLay was. If that's the direction that the leaders want to go, I would be happy to go that direction as well."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: judiciary; tomdelay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 04/08/2005 3:04:44 PM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingattax
"I believe we have a fair and independent judiciary today," Frist added.

Frist is a wuss. This is an issue where the Repubs really have a chance to step up and do something for their constituents, but no, they're going to squander it and act like the gutless turds that they are. It's obvious that the RINOs are in charge and need to be voted out.

2 posted on 04/08/2005 3:08:21 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Proud infidel since 1970.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
You shall judge of a man by his foes as well as by his friends.

You are good man, Tom Delay!

3 posted on 04/08/2005 3:10:46 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Two reasons this article is biased:
1) it creates the impression that only "religious conservatives" are appalled by the judiciary's blatantly unconstitutional power grab;
2) it never mentions that Article III of the Constitution indicates that DeLay is RIGHT. It just make it sounds like the "embattled" DeLay is ranting because he doesn't get his way w/the courts.
4 posted on 04/08/2005 3:12:03 PM PDT by TimeLord (A whale fetus is a whale; a human fetus is a blob.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Congress determines the jurisdiction of each court. The administration is responsible for providing the facilities for each court.

Congress could make the 11th Circuit responsible for hearing disputes over traffic tickets in Nome. The President could assign them a court facility made up of cardboard boxes behind the bus terminal.

The founders intended that each branch be mostly independent of the others, but gave each powers by which they could exert influence on the others.

It's a question only of whether they have the will to use them.


5 posted on 04/08/2005 3:13:01 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdege

we might as well get this once and for all :

the repubs in congress have NO nads.


6 posted on 04/08/2005 3:18:11 PM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: kingattax

Smith just got my vote next time.


8 posted on 04/08/2005 3:19:03 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Circuit Judge Stanley F. Birch Jr>"Congress chose to overstep constitutional boundaries into the province of the judiciary. Such an act cannot be countenanced."

C'mon Judge...even a dumb nobody like me knowsCongress has a lawful, legal, and CONSTITUTIONAL right to reign in the judiciary!

Wouldn't have a bit of a *vested interest* there, now would you?

9 posted on 04/08/2005 3:19:58 PM PDT by MamaTexan (Minutemen.....the REAL American heroes!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

it's amazing to see how these maniac judges can bluff the other branches. unreal


10 posted on 04/08/2005 3:22:11 PM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity; kingattax
Frist is a weenie, defined as a little tiny impotent wuss. The good news is that Frist just eliminated his RINO yellow butt from the 2008 race. Not that he could have won, but he is OUTAHERE!
11 posted on 04/08/2005 3:27:16 PM PDT by HonestConservative (Bless our Servicemen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity


Delay has always been the man that gets it done. I think Frist is the mind behind it.


12 posted on 04/08/2005 3:29:30 PM PDT by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE FIRST-Republican second)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

DeLay for President.


13 posted on 04/08/2005 3:31:35 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TimeLord

Its amazing how few people are aware of the facts that you present. Must be that Government school thing, perpetrating the myth of the "Living" Constitution.


14 posted on 04/08/2005 3:31:54 PM PDT by HonestConservative (Bless our Servicemen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

We should take not of all the rogue Republicans and each State should work to kick them out next election. Maybe it is time for Congress to set term limits.


15 posted on 04/08/2005 3:38:41 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

Lamar Smith's web page.
http://lamarsmith.house.gov/


Notice the link to his opposition to granting amnesty to illegal aliens.
http://lamarsmith.house.gov/media/pdfs/BorderPatrolLetter.pdf



16 posted on 04/08/2005 3:53:05 PM PDT by i_dont_chat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Frist is a wuss.

Yes he is, big time. When people say he's planning to run for the White House I cringe. He will never be aggressive enough to be President. He would never beat Hilary.

17 posted on 04/08/2005 3:56:09 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
the judiciary has "run amok" and demanding that Congress assert authority over the courts.

This is so true. Our founding father, Thomas Jefferson told us this would happen, in very specifically. In fact it was already starting during his time...

18 posted on 04/08/2005 4:00:03 PM PDT by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

God bless Tom Delay! And God bless Rush for fighting the Good fight for him. FReegards....


19 posted on 04/08/2005 4:04:08 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

I would vote for him.


20 posted on 04/08/2005 4:06:01 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson