Explain to me how the creature they're calling "early man" had a backbone that connected to the skull like that of a monkey, yet in one gigantic "missing link", the back bone of a man connects to the skull like that of a bear with completely different DNA??
I think "cave man" was just another animal. Maybe it's just big foot.
I should emphasize "could" more often.
Did you miss the part where I said the idea evolution was weak?
"... "early man" had a backbone that connected to the skull like that of a monkey, yet in one gigantic "missing link", the back bone of a man connects to the skull like that of a bear with completely different DNA??"
What have you been reading???
"Maybe it's just big foot."
Oh, now I understand... Tabloids