To: Non-Sequitur
That's fine, but that's not what he was asked to do. He was asked to rehear and reassert the facts of the case -- not verify that the procedures were lawful.
52 posted on
03/31/2005 3:31:11 PM PST by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
That's fine, but that's not what he was asked to do. He was asked to rehear and reassert the facts of the case -- not verify that the procedures were lawful. But again, absent any new evidence what grounds would he have for overturning the decision that had been upheld before?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson